Search for: "State v. Minor"
Results 8041 - 8060
of 16,410
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2015, 2:02 pm
The court only needed to consider three cases to determine that preemption did not bar plaintiffs’ claim: Levine, Maya v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 11:12 am
In the case, Rodriguez v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 10:00 am
Supreme Court’s pronouncement that interracial marriage bans are unconstitutional in Loving v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 9:55 am
The state asks (1) whether the Michigan courts’ decision not to extend United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
And as the Supreme Court made clear 50 years ago in Brandenburg v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 7:21 pm
Supreme Court’s decision last year in Burwell v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 12:57 pm
A familiar sight for lawyersinvolved in TVCatchup suitsITV Broadcasting Limited, ITV 2 Limited, ITV Digital Channels Limited, Channel Four Television Corporation, 4 Ventures Limited, Channel 5 Broadcasting Limited and ITV Studios Limited v TVCatchup Limited (in administration), TVCatchup (UK) Limited and Media Resources Limited (a Mauritian company) [2015] EWCA Civ 204 is the latest development in the long-running copyright litigation saga which is usually known by its shorter name of ITV… [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 11:02 am
But Justice Antonin Scalia in his dissent sees the majority as issuing “a sweeping holding that will have profound implications for the constitutional ideal of one person, one vote, for the future of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, and for the primacy of the State in managing its own elections. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 9:33 am
Alabama and Alabama Democratic Conference v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
True, Ely himself thought Roe v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 7:06 pm
(Jewell's Lessee v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 9:21 am
Below, I have summarized Barajas v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 8:09 pm
Viral Hepatitis in Minority America. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 1:47 pm
The recurring issue of life sentences without the possibility of parole for individuals who commit murder when they were minors is back on the Supreme Court’s decision docket. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 3:32 am
His motion argued that the dealership agreement and state regulations required her, as a non-employee family member, to return the car. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 2:16 am
” The press release goes on to state that “it has become clear that given our minority and dissident position on the board, we are unable to ensure either that an appropriate investigation is conducted or that SQM collaborate effectively with the Public Prosecutor. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
Stancil v. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 7:24 pm
Then follows an alternative provision that in default of appointment the property shall go unto such person or persons living at the death of the said party of the first part, and being her heir or heirs at law, as would be entitled to take the same by descent from her in case the same was land belonging to her, situate in the state of New York, and, if more than one person, then in the proportion in that behalf prescribed by the laws of said state. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 12:10 pm
Strother v. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 12:10 pm
Strother v. [read post]
