Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 8041 - 8060
of 14,273
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2008, 5:03 pm
" McCulloch v. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 7:37 am
The case is Butler et al. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 2:06 pm
In the United States, merchants have challenged the fees in a seemingly endless series of antitrust cases, one of which (Visa v. [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 12:01 am
Supreme Court declared the Tenure of Office Act unconstitutional in its ruling in Myers v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 4:11 am
The TBA applauds the Supreme Court’s strong leadership on indigent representation reform. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 7:25 am
Merisant Co. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2025, 7:24 am
The opinion by the Third District Court of Appeal came in the case of Avila v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 6:22 am
Kong v. [read post]
Why Virginia will not be invited to the dance (the Supreme Court battle over the individual mandate)
17 Oct 2011, 8:15 pm
See, e.g., Watt v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 1:28 am
Slip-N-Slide Records, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:56 am
The Lerner Decision In May 2014, the First Department issued Lerner v Prince (119 AD3d 122 [1st Dept 2014]). [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 7:46 am
First Resort, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 9:00 pm
For some policymakers, the repeal of Roe v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:51 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Alfonso Rodriguez v. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 6:39 am
Iguana tell you a story . . .State v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 2:42 pm
That’s the problem the court faced in United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 10:22 am
Hofmann v. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 9:14 am
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, Brandt v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 9:00 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> DE Department of Natural Res. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 12:30 am
Entitlement to priority (A-III-6.1)Following G 1/22 (and G 2/22), A-III-6.1 has been updated to state "absent any substantiated indication to the contrary, there is a strong rebuttable presumption under the EPC that an applicant or joint applicants claiming priority in accordance with Art. 88(1) and Rule 52 are also entitled to the claimed priority. [read post]
