Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Laws" Results 8041 - 8060 of 55,071
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2013, 6:24 am by The Charge
  Indeed, a government of the people, by the people and for the people should celebrate its laws and ensure that they reflect the public will. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 7:38 am by OBABL Staff
Naturally, they broke this story:  Duke Law School Asks:  Why Do Black People Hate Us? [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 12:22 pm by Eric Goldman
Consultants, Inc., 293 F.3d 708, 712 (4th Cir. 2002) (a case I still discuss in my Internet Law course) and especially Young v. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 9:49 am by William Weinberg
Known as a “Watson Murder” charge, this crime gets its name from a California Supreme Court case, People v. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 8:01 pm by Ryan
I looked at cases involving the Hartford Whalers, various cases about people hitting each other with hockey sticks, and Jaworski v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 9:50 am
For those who are interested, the seminal case is Little v. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 5:17 pm
Anybody who follows the Court's work at all understands that a judicial decision to uphold a law is not necessarily an endorsement of the law's policy; and people who don't follow the Court's work are unlikely to learn of these nuances. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Branker, No. 07-8 Denial of habeas petition challenging convictions for the murder of a state trooper and a deputy sheriff is affirmed where: 1) the Supreme Court of North Carolina did not unreasonably apply the clearly established federal law of Batson v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 6:58 pm by Donna Bader
  When I first started reading Kincaid v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 7:30 am by Aidan Wills, Matrix
The Justices considered two previous judgments in which it/the House of Lords has held suspicionless stop and search powers to comply with article 8 (R (Gillan) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2006] UKHL 12; Beghal v Director of Public Prosecutions [2015] UKSC 49) and the European Court of Human Rights’ (ECtHR) decision in Gillan v UK (2010) application no. 4158/05, in which it held that the suspicionless search power under section 44 of the Terrorism… [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 12:02 pm by David G. Badertscher
The authority to consent did not depend on property law distinctions, but instead depended on whether there was mutual use of the property by people who generally had joint access or control. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  One thing people are realizing is that TM is messy. [read post]