Search for: "UNITED STATE FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT" Results 8041 - 8060 of 36,412
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2023, 2:24 pm by Kalvis Golde
United States 23-219Issue: Whether, for purposes of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 6:14 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
§ 1391(e)(1)(B); and (iii) whether the Court will transfer the case to the United States District Court for the District of Arizona under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 3:23 am by Michael Lowe
  It is true they are no longer mandatory, but discretionary pursuant to the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 11:39 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Lamberth, the chief judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, ruled in the detainees’ favor, characterizing the government’s arguments using terms like “untenable,” “quite preposterous,” “even less persuasive,” and “does not pass the smell test. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 3:38 pm by John C. Manoog III
The Decision on Appeal The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed the trial court’s dismissal of the parents’ complaint but relied solely on federal, rather than state, grounds. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 10:13 am
  The Law Offices of Stephen Neyman represents people charged with crimes in federal and state courts. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 9:36 pm
§ 1498(a) The statute states:Whenever an invention described in and covered by a patent of the United States is used or manufactured by or for the United States . . . the owner’s remedy shall be by action against the United States in the United States Court of Federal Claims . . . .28 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Two years later, President James Madison nominated Tucker to the federal district court in Virginia. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 6:36 am by Daniel E. Cummins
"  The Superior Court in Indalex found persuasive the analysis of the United States District Court for the Western District Court of Pennsylvania on the relationship between the gist of the action doctrine and the duty to defend. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 4:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Schwartz,No. 07-1249-pr;UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT;2009 U.S. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 4:17 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Breuer and United States Attorney for the Middle District of North Carolina Ripley Rand. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 2:54 pm by Josephine Liu
”  Indeed, last month a federal district court in California granted summary judgment for Citibank on this issue, holding that “imposition of liability under the TCPA for a single, confirmatory text message would constitute an impermissibly absurd and unforeseen result. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 2:54 pm by Josephine Liu
”  Indeed, last month a federal district court in California granted summary judgment for Citibank on this issue, holding that “imposition of liability under the TCPA for a single, confirmatory text message would constitute an impermissibly absurd and unforeseen result. [read post]
The District Court expressly agreed with the Second and Eleventh Circuit’s interpretations of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Walling v. [read post]