Search for: "United States v. Close" Results 8041 - 8060 of 14,200
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2014, 6:46 am by Doug Cornelius
The SEC’s complaint stated that the defendants “offered investors the opportunity to purchase undervalued condominium units and obtain an immediate 15 percent return through a two-year leaseback agreement with Cay Clubs. [read post]
13 May 2014, 9:01 pm by Saira Mohamed
The United States Supreme Court already has turned to foreign and international law in its decisions on the death penalty; in the majority opinion in Roper v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 4:20 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
The letter briefly mentions Google’s interception and collection of private Wi-Fi communications across the United States over several years. [read post]
11 May 2014, 5:45 am by Bill Otis
., here, that criminal trials have all but disappeared in the United States and essentially have been replaced by plea bargaining. [read post]
9 May 2014, 5:11 pm
  The dishonor of reading enumerated rights out of the Privileges or Immunities Clause falls to a later case, United States v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:54 am by John Elwood
  The Court denied review in the twice-relisted (and closely watched) Drake v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 7:45 am by Wells Bennett
Come and get it: a new trove of recently filed and/or unsealed pleadings in the closely watched and vigorously debated case of Al-Nashiri v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 6:02 am
As long as the United States in its current form, under our Constitution, persists, it's never too late to confirm a replacement for Ruth Bader Ginsburg. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:25 am
To date, however, scholars remain deeply divided regarding the nature and scope of the “privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:21 am by Gene Quinn
The United States Supreme Court recently issued two much-anticipated decisions on fee shifting in patent litigation. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:00 am by Yishai Schwartz
When Ralls filed suit alleging violations of due process and the Administrative Procedure Act, President Obama himself issued a similar order demanding that Ralls divest and stating that he had “credible evidence” that Ralls’ actions might “impair the national security of the United States. [read post]
8 May 2014, 6:05 am by Amy Howe
”  In her column for The Washington Post, Ruth Marcus similarly decries the ruling, contending that, although the United States is “a predominantly Christian nation,” “we live here, too — we are Americans, too — and the Constitution, which prohibits elevating one religion over another, demands some sensitivity to this fact. [read post]
7 May 2014, 6:45 am by Maureen Johnston
§ 1605(a)(2), a tort claim for personal injuries suffered in connection with travel outside of the United States is “based upon” the allegedly tortious conduct occurring outside of the United States or the preceding sale of the ticket in the United States for the travel entirely outside the United States. [read post]