Search for: "United States v. Good" Results 8041 - 8060 of 21,077
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2022, 6:53 am by Guest Author
United States should lead a court to find that the FTC lacks authority to issue competition rules. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:39 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  Almost three-quarters of the legislatures in the United States passed new capital sentencing laws after Furman, and they all had to figure out what that badly fractured decision meant. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 11:53 am by Cody Poplin
But, as the battle for Tikrit ramps up, the Wall Street Journal reports that the United States is walking back its plan to retake Mosul in April. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 8:39 am by Bexis
  Reeves thus adds to this list of cases finding prescription drugs or devices not to be “consumer” goods covered by such statutes:  Williams v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 5:38 pm by Lawrence Solum
" The organization of this article is as follows: Part I provides a brief history of pleading theory within the United States and a reexamination of the Conley v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:05 am by Maureen Johnston
Donald 14-618Issue: (1) Whether the Michigan courts' decision not to extend United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
For example, if, in a layoff situation, the clerk having greater seniority than a co-worker employed as a clerk in the same layoff unit is excessed, the typical redress awarded to the individual incorrectly laid off is reinstatement to his or her former position with full back salary and benefits. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
For example, if, in a layoff situation, the clerk having greater seniority than a co-worker employed as a clerk in the same layoff unit is excessed, the typical redress awarded to the individual incorrectly laid off is reinstatement to his or her former position with full back salary and benefits. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 12:37 pm
  (I'll leave for another day her implicit claim that the United States Supreme Court should grant certiorari in this case and overrule X.)But Justice Liu is also correct. [read post]