Search for: "United States v. Justice" Results 8041 - 8060 of 32,498
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2018, 12:48 pm by John Ellis
Starbucks Corporation (S234969) on whether California wage and hour law recognizes the de minimis doctrine established by the United States Supreme Court in Anderson v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
United States, the court held 7-2 that to convict a defendant in U.S. illegally for violating a federal gun-possession law, prosecutors must show that defendant knew he was in the country illegally. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 4:21 pm by Daniel Harawa
United States, yet another case concerning the scope of the Armed Career Criminal Act. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 9:13 am by Scott Bomboy
Back in 2011, the church won a victory at the United States Supreme Court in Snyder v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 10:45 am
Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335 (1980); and a third based on United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 8:24 am by Court C. VanTassell
The Court affirmed that the landowners’ state law claims were not preempted by CERLCA, but restoration damages must actually be used to restore the property Section 113(b) of CERCLA provides that “United States district courts shall have exclusive jurisdiction over all controversies arising under this chapter. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 2:56 am by NCC Staff
On June 21, 1989, a deeply divided United States Supreme Court upheld the rights of protesters to burn the American flag in a landmark First Amendment decision. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:09 am by Daniel Walters
The first line in Justice Neil Gorsuch’s partial concurrence in Kisor v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Tsige, however, the case appears to signal an increasing willingness to expand the scope of privacy torts in Canada and to follow the United States in doing so. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 2:14 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
” –Justice Kennedy, in majority opinion – OBERGEFELL ET AL. v. [read post]
Pham and the Open Society Justice Initiative argued that if the Supreme Court was in any doubt on the application of EU law, it should refer the ambiguity to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). [read post]