Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 8041 - 8060 of 10,394
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2011, 5:07 am
 This issue includes a special dedication to the former Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Paul R. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 12:54 am by Kevin LaCroix
These unlawful marketing activities were responsible for Pfizer paying the largest fine in United States history. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 7:18 am by Nabiha Syed
United States — both of which had been relisted from previous conferences. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 9:56 pm
I highly favour the role of an “IP coordinator,” and I am pleased that the United States went in this direction. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:22 pm by Larry Munn
As another recent article notes, the restaurant industry is no stranger to trademark issues, including the lawsuit recently launched by the Wild Wing restaurant chain in Aurora, Ontario against Buffalo Wild Wings, a United States franchise operator that is expanding into Canada. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am by Tana Fye
”[27]              The United States Supreme Court recognized that the proceeding at issue was a “child custody proceeding” and that the children involved in that proceeding were “Indian children. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am by Tana Fye
”[27]              The United States Supreme Court recognized that the proceeding at issue was a “child custody proceeding” and that the children involved in that proceeding were “Indian children. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:20 am
 The timing of the suit also raises several questions because the UGG mark has been used for footwear in the United States since at least 1998 and UGG was named “brand of the year” by Footwear News in 2003, nearly a decade ago. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 8:25 pm by Kelly
(PatLit) United States US General USPTO launches websites to discuss patent and trademark procedures (inovia) US Patent Reform Will patent reform come up in a big way in the 112th Congress? [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 2:17 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
In that case, the Court held that the United States held "absolute fee simple" title to Hawaii's ceded lands, and that Congress' 1992 Apology Resolution had no legal effect. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:34 am by Amanda Rice
United States, predicting that the Court’s “ruling is likely to be quite narrow. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:34 am by Amanda Rice
United States, predicting that the Court’s “ruling is likely to be quite narrow. [read post]