Search for: "v. JONES"
Results 8041 - 8060
of 9,905
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2010, 8:25 am
I will select just the articles and posts that I consider especially noteworthy.Day 1 of the trialAndrew Pugno, General Counsel Andy Pugno Comments On Opening Day Of Trial, 01/11/10 ProtectMarriage.com Action FundDan Levine, Gay Couples Testify as Marriage Case Starts, The Recorder (SF legal newspaper), 01/12/10NCLR’s Legal Director Shannon Minter on Perry v Schwarzenegger Proceedings, Day 1, 01/11/10 Pam's House BlendKaren Ocamb, A heavy burden for the Prop 8 defenders, 01/12/10… [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 7:51 am
Hauter, 14 Cal.3d at 110 (citing Jones v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 7:49 am
Jones, (new trial in agg robbery case due to judge improperly and inaccurately commenting on evidence, blogged about here), State v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 5:29 am
See Conners v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
For anyone marginally familiar with the current financial crisis and Judge Posner's opinion in Jones v. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 10:22 pm
" Lone Star Fund V (US), LP v. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 4:17 am
" The Velez case relied on by the court addresses the presumption issue in more detail: "The [car] presumption establishes a prima facie case against a defendant, who may, if he chooses, rebut it by interposing evidence to the contrary (People v Lemmons, 40 NY2d 505, 510; People v Jones, 57 AD2d 595). [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 4:12 am
Inc., v Flaum, 25 AD3d 534; Penthouse Media Group v Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones [US Dist Ct, SD NY, 9 Civ 85, Scheindlin, J., 2009]). [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 10:00 pm
Admiralty v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 2:17 pm
In this week's case (Sidhu v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 10:36 am
Boyd v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 1:53 pm
Justice Jones writes a concise (nine-page) opinion that goes through the various factors and explains why the two were indeed a joint venture. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 5:41 am
Farey-Jones, supra. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 4:40 pm
Jones (2003) 108 Cal.App.4th 455, 463.) [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 7:24 am
However, in two business cases, Jones v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 2:48 am
Hammonds LLP (a Firm) v Jones Court of Appeal “‘All partners’ in the context of a clause in a partnership deed dealing with accounts, meant partners at any time during the accounting year to which the particular accounts related, whether or not, by the relevant time, they were still partners in the firm. [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 7:20 pm
In State v. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 11:45 pm
State v. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 6:30 am
App. 369, 376 (2007); Jones v. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
(Aug. 10) Jones v. [read post]
