Search for: "v. Smith"
Results 8041 - 8060
of 16,224
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2013, 5:00 am
Stryker Corp., 669 F.3d 501, 508 (5th Cir. 2012); Smith v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 4:11 pm
(Strickland was a capital case.)This panel questioned the validity of prior Ninth Circuit decisions like Cooper-Smith v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 5:13 am
| IP: When innovation is the answer to a spiritual funkNever Too Late 63 [week ending on Sunday 13 September] - Fair compensation in reprography and private copying: the ECS’ version | Substitute sellers | Teva UK Ltd & Another v Leo Pharma | Evidence-based IP policy | KitKat case | UK IPO’s priorities | UK IPO’s website vs complete copyright legislation | Patent Attorney Qualifications | Mylan and Actavis v… [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
| Criminalisation of IP and economics | Keeping count of blocked websites in the UK |Birkin Bags | Patentability of user interface designs in Germany |Smith & Nephew v ConvaTec | Report on IPEC litigation |does Twitter have a future? [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 5:00 am
Halliburton Co., 131 S.Ct. 2179 (2011); Smith v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 9:13 am
" NFP criminal opinions today (9): John Smith v. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 4:22 pm
Sineneng-Smith. [read post]
7 May 2020, 12:24 pm
Sineneng-Smith is one of the strangest Supreme Court cases I have read in a long time. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:40 pm
In United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 3:03 pm
Preventing Head Injuries Through Bicycle Helmet Care I’m Ed Smith, an Oakley Bicycle Accident Lawyer. [read post]
26 May 2017, 6:29 am
Smith, 16-992, was relisted on Monday for yesterday’s conference. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 2:12 pm
As always, these summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to present. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 6:09 am
As always, these summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to present. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 8:25 pm
Smith Related posts:Supreme Court Review: Summers v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 12:48 pm
In Employment Division v Smith (the case that gave rise to the law at issue in Boerne), the Court held that Native Americans who ingested peyote sacramentally were not exempt from state drug laws (and could, therefore, be denied unemployment benefits when fired for using peyote.) [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 8:46 am
Waller v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 3:40 am
Reference: Smith v. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 6:21 am
First, consider Fulton v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 7:57 pm
Arthrex, Smith & Nephew, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 8:47 am
Cir., Smith Co.). [read post]
