Search for: "All Defendants" Results 8061 - 8080 of 165,001
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2018, 7:26 am by Docket Navigator
Because the Court finds that [defendant's] actions regarding the issue of obviousness on Claims 8 and 19 were not made in good faith, but as an attempt to extend the time of the ITC preclusion order on these two claims directed against [plaintiff], the Court finds this portion of the case to be sufficiently exceptional to warrant awarding [plaintiff] one half of the attorneys' fees incurred during the week of the trial (to reflect [plaintiff's] attorney time spent on the… [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 6:31 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
We have a default judgment against one defendant for actions that a jury found, in a case against a related defendant, did not happen. [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:17 am by PaulKostro
The defendant has the burden to offer expert testimony to support a claim that he “could not form intent in his mental state. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm
  The jury unanimously agrees, after all, that the defendant was guilty of (at least) voluntary manslaughter; they just disagree as to whether it's murder. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 12:53 pm by Lebowitz & Mzhen
– is more plaintiff-friendly in that any at-fault defendant can be held wholly liable for all of the plaintiff’s damages. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 8:32 am by Mayberry Law Firm
Before his trial, the defendant and prosecution went through jury selection, where each side was permitted to exclude jurors, either for cause or for no cause at all. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 12:53 pm by Lebowitz & Mzhen
– is more plaintiff-friendly in that any at-fault defendant can be held wholly liable for all of the plaintiff’s damages. [read post]
5 May 2010, 9:33 am by Karen E. Keller
This discovery was not limited to products known by the defendant to enter the United States, but instead covers all worldwide sales, regardless of whether the defendant knows where its products are going. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 4:44 am by Monroe Freedman
  The defendant decides, unilaterally, the maximum amount for which it is willing to settle all claims against it.3. [read post]
California has seen more of these cases than any other state, finding itself host to over 15% of all DTSA claims. [read post]
5 Nov 2023, 11:28 am by The Law Blogger
 The Crypto King was largely done in by three of his former colleagues and friends, all co-defendants in his case who turned state's evidence against Bankman-Fried. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 8:37 am by Mack Sperling
  As to Defendant Steiner-Crowley, even though all the claims against her were subject to Rule 11 sanctions, he did not award her all of her fees. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:45 am by Jonathan Mincer
”   Verrilli argued that the health insurance market is unique because essentially all people participate in it. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 7:26 pm by Jamie Markham
All prior felonies and misdemeanors count, and they all count equally. [read post]