Search for: "Cost v. Cost" Results 8061 - 8080 of 48,971
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
” [4] The definition of substantial costs is 1.5 times more than (regular) partial indemnity costs; Punitive costs have been described by the Supreme Court of Canada as appropriate “only where there has been reprehensible, scandalous or outrageous conduct on the part of one of the parties” (Young v Young, [1993] 4 SCR 3, 1993 at para 260) [5] Delichte v Rogers, 2013 MBQB 93, M. [read post]
23 May 2014, 4:15 am by Peter Tillers
Larry Laudan, Eyewitness Identifications: One More Lesson on the Costs of Excluding Relevant Evidence SSRN Archive (March 15, 2012): Abstract:       Recent research has revealed that sequential lineup eyewitness identifications are less likely to falsely identify an innocent suspect as the culprit than are traditional simultaneous lineups. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 12:29 pm
Two of these patents - the '881 patent and the '564 patent (GB No. 2,317,564)- were subject to this morning's Court of Appeal decision in Omnipharm v Merial [2013] EWCA Civ 2. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 1:16 pm
In L'Oréal SA and others v Bellure NV and others [2010] EWCA Civ 535[noted here by the IPKat] a comparative advertisement was held to constitute unfair practice where one brand had taken unfair advantage of the reputation of another well-known brand by free-riding on the coat tails of their success. [read post]