Search for: "DOE 5"
Results 8061 - 8080
of 84,775
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2011, 6:45 am
Sec. 1.401(a)(35)-1(f)(5). [read post]
28 May 2009, 2:08 pm
The Tyson tragedy does not appear to involve an operating treadmill. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 6:35 am
We have written here frequently about California’s controversial AB 5 law, which permits companies to treat workers as independent contractors only if they satisfy a stringent “ABC” test. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 5:00 pm
Southwest Airlines, @SouthwestAir, still does. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 3:36 am
Does the attorney have a legal malpractice responsibility to the client, in the absence of privity? [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 4:09 am
The deadline for comments on CP31/18 is 5 April 2019. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 6:21 am
The rate of new securities class action filings appears to be stabilizing, but that does not mean 2019 has been lacking in important developments in securities law. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 10:01 pm
Aug. 5, 2009), granted a PMA preemption motion to dismiss. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 6:41 am
While it does not directly relate to the legal question in the referral, a relevant consideration was recently published in CA/5/19, which relates to an additional lease for further staff, conference rooms and common areas for the EPO in Haar. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 9:42 am
The House bill does include language that directs the agencies to generally consider “whether the release of the records would be in the public interest because it is likely to contribute significantly to public understanding of the operations or activities of the government. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 1:30 am
With regards to Article 5, the exceptions and limitations in it have to be protected in terms of their efficacy.The Court continued that the Charter does expressly protect intellectual property rights, but those rights are by no means superior to everything, and can be broken given the appropriate exception. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 7:24 am
"The Supreme Court ruled that this provision does not go as far as granting an online publicly accessible database, ie Wikipedia [here for Wikimedia's reaction to the judgment], the right to make photographs of artworks located permanently outdoors or in public spaces available to the public. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:35 am
Article 5(3) does not require, in particular, that the activity concerned be ‘directed to’ the Member State in which the court seised is situated" [para 32]. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 9:39 am
— Adam Jacobs (@ajacobsIP) December 5, 2016My 1st nomination for the #clawbies2016 goes out to @TheLawofWork and https://t.co/cSuyjKCzNE, great resource for Labour and Employment— Saranjit Cheema (@SaranjitCheema) December 5, 20162nd #clawbies2016 nomination goes to @pauldalyesq and https://t.co/Wm1FsJFrIc, blog does the impossible by bringing admin law down to earth— Saranjit Cheema (@SaranjitCheema) December 5, 2016My first nomination for… [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 1:30 am
With regards to Article 5, the exceptions and limitations in it have to be protected in terms of their efficacy.The Court continued that the Charter does expressly protect intellectual property rights, but those rights are by no means superior to everything, and can be broken given the appropriate exception. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 6:30 am
“Non-Asian” does not constitute a “race” for the purposes of Executive Order (EO) 11246 enforcement, ruled a DOL Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) in granting summary judgment to a federal contractor in a disparate impact hiring case (OFCCP v VF Jeanswear Ltd Partnership, ALJ Case No 2011-OFC-00006, August 5, 2013, Krantz, K). [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 2:54 pm
Linder, 268 U.S. 5 (1925). [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 11:51 am
Nov. 5, 2010) (unpublished per curiam affirmance), the Fourth Circuit was squarely faced with the duty question. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 12:03 pm
Given that, the New Act does not apply to agreements entered into before May 11, 2011. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 4:41 am
What exactly does “Best Interest Of The Child” mean in an Illinois divorce or custody case? [read post]