Search for: "Generics International (US) Inc" Results 8061 - 8080 of 9,130
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2009, 2:25 am by gmlevine
Typically, the complainant is sent on its way, as seen in FPI Fireplace Products International Ltd. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 8:57 pm
Cir. 2008), make clear that the Supreme Court's decision in KSR International Co. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 4:29 pm by structuredsettlements
In the case of AIG the TARP Funds flowed to American International Group, Inc., not to American International Life Assurahnce Company of New York or American General Life Insurance Company. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 12:33 pm
Co. of N.Y., 10 NY3d 187, 192 [2008] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Panasia Estates, Inc. v Hudson Ins. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
Century City Apartments Property Services CC and Another v Century City Property Owners Association (Afro-IP)   Spain A branding miracle from: from bullring to shop windows (Class 46)   Ukraine Ukrainian Higher Economic Court denies Ferrero’s claim on Raffaello trade mark infringement: Group Ferrero v Landrin (Class 46)   United Kingdom EWHC on compensation for employee inventors whose patents are particularly beneficial to employers: Shanks v Unilever plc & Ors (IPKat)… [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 1:59 am
Seneca Foods products are sold under the Libby's, Aunt Nellie's Farm Kitchen, Stokely's, READ, and Seneca labels and under an alliance with General Mills Operations, LLC, a successor to the Pillsbury Company and a subsidiary of General Mills, Inc., Seneca produces canned and frozen vegetables, which are sold by General Mills Operations, LLC under the Green Giant label. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 1:58 am
International Seaway Trading v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 7:57 am
For most of us who juggle part-time jobs, there's generally not a lot left over after we pay the bills. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 2:19 am by gmlevine
Virtual Point Inc., D2008-1183 (WIPO September 25, 2008), the Panel held that it saw “no injustice in the ‘internal’ transfer of the Domain Name within the wider business group, producing the ‘side effect’ of giving the third party trade mark owner who has been subjected to the bad faith use, an opportunity to invoke the Policy which it would not otherwise have had (because it could not show that the original registration of the disputed… [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 1:04 am
(internal citation omitted). [read post]