Search for: "Head v State" Results 8061 - 8080 of 14,434
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2011, 3:35 am by Kelly
ICG America (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Microsoft  – Microsoft says Apple’s ‘App Store’ trademark too generic to exist (ArsTechnica) (Innovationpartners) Soaring Helmet – Keyword advertiser headed to trial: Soaring Helmet v Nanal (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 12:09 am by Vikram Raghavan
Whilst state practice can be found in support (see Filártiga v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 6:04 am by SHG
  I see you shaking your head. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 7:25 am by Almudena Azcárate Ortega
Section 6 – Emergency Assistance  The Artemis Accords echo the language of not just the Outer Space Treaty, and particularly Article V, but also the 1968 Agreement on the Rescue of Astronauts, the Return of Astronauts and the Return of Objects Launched into Outer Space (known as the Rescue and Return Agreement), which in Article II stipulates that states must take all possible steps to rescue the personnel of a spacecraft and render all necessary assistance. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 5:16 am by Karine Bannelier
Indeed, as Alexander Seger, head of cybercrime at the Council of Europe observed, it is likely that, when the dust settles in the negotiations, the vast majority of U.N. states will support a convention on cybercrime that is very similar to the Budapest Convention. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 3:57 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Not important stuff like how many constitutions can dance on the head of a pin. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 10:24 am
In New Jersey and many other states, this normal rule is turned on its head when a company becomes insolvent. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 5:00 am by Chris
While at WilmerHale he was the lead counsel representing the University of Michigan and its then president Lee Bollinger before the United States Supreme Court in the famous Gratz v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 5:07 am
See, I don't even need to read them anymore.....Salinas v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 5:49 am
The IPKat is really disappointed that this action is being brought in the United States and not in Europe following last month's Intel v CPM ruling (see IPKat here and here), where counsel on both sides could indulge in endless argument as to the state of mind of the relevant consumer, the likelihood of confusion and the extent to which the use of the mark on the t-shirt might be expected to affect the economic activity of consumers of the claimant's rolling… [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 12:56 pm by Eve Ross
Supreme Court justice Thurgood Marshall later acknowledged [Pauli Murray’s first book, States’ Laws on Race and Color] as his ‘bible’ in the historic Brown v. [read post]