Search for: "Head v State" Results 8061 - 8080 of 14,434
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2013, 4:01 am by Peter Mahler
Jacobs of the Delaware Court of Chancery (currently serving as a Justice of the Delaware Supreme Court), is Fulk v. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 10:15 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Without public disclosure, you'd be much less secure against cybercriminals, hacktivists, and state-sponsored cyberattackers.The NSA's actions turn that process on its head, which is why the security community is so incensed. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 8:08 am
Over the last several years I have been considering the issue of corruption generally, --Soft Extra Territorialism and American Anti-Corruption Campaigns, Sept. 12, 2006; --Soft Extra Territorialism and Anti-Corruption Campaigns: On the Perverse Folly of Corrupt States, Sept. 15, 2006);--Rockwell International v. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 5:23 am by Susan Brenner
[At trial,] David Lopez, a head-end technician for Time Warner Cable, testified that sometime in late January or early February 2008, he arrived at work at the company's Northern Manhattan office . . . and spotted [Puesan] nearby. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 1:06 pm by Bill Ward
The bay side of the island is only protected by a bulk head that is four feet high. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 12:49 pm
That this should be necessary demonstrates the dysfunctional state of the SPC system at present. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 12:00 am
Keep an eye on the case of State v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 12:20 am by Carl Lietz
Over at the State Bar today here in Atlanta, the Federal Defender Office is holding its annual Saint Crispin’s Day Seminar. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 11:55 am by emagraken
If the plaintiff does not pursue sedentary work but continues to work in sales or some other occupation that requires her to be on her feet for the majority of the day, I find that her stated preference for part-time work is reasonable given her symptoms and limitations. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 7:51 am by Laura H. Juillet
 Does the recent case of Warner v Armfield Retail & Leisure Ltd change how an employer should react? [read post]