Search for: "JOHN DOES 1 -10"
Results 8061 - 8080
of 9,149
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2008, 5:00 am
Despite media commentary that suggests a fundamental transformation in race-based voting, Obama failed to win a majority of white voters in eleven "blue states," and he only won a slight majority (51-52%) in five others, including his home state of Illinois, where he received just over 1/2 of votes cast by whites. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 7:01 pm
Dep't of Justice, No. 071384 In a matter brought by Associated Press for denial of request for any petitions seeking to reduce a twenty-two year prison sentence of John Walker Lindh, convicted of aiding the Taliban in Afghanistan, dismissal of plaintiff's complaint under the Freedom of Information Act and grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant are affirmed where: 1) a significant privacy interest is implicated in release of Lindh's petition; 2) plaintiff… [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 11:09 pm
Experts say the final price for the team will be about $1 billion. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 7:49 pm
How does a traditional state holiday on October 31st affect the timeliness of an appeal that was due on October 27th? [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 5:00 pm
In that case, the federal court in Miami issued a July 1, 2008 Order approving service of the John Doe Summons. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 1:02 pm
In the Matter of the Adoption of John Doe and James Doe came before the Court on a petition for adoption of two foster children by a gay man who had raised the children since 2004. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 5:26 pm
Does 1-11, the District Court has granted the defendant John Doe #9's motion for severance, and severed as to Doe #9 and all other defendants except John Doe #1.District Judge Kathleen O'Malley rejected the RIAA's argument that severance was premature, agreed with the authorities that had granted severance, and dismissed the authorities cited by the RIAA as providing insufficient analysis, explanation, or… [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 4:46 pm
Does 1-9, a Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, case targeting Carnegie Mellon students, in which a student -- appearing pro se -- succeeded in challenging the misjoinder of John Does, but failed to get dismissal of the complaint or quashing of the subpoena, the Magistrate Judge's ruling has now been affirmed by the District Court Judge.The appeal has been pending for approximately one year.November 28, 2008, Order Affirming Rulings of Magistrate Judge*-->*… [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 5:13 pm
John R. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 2:00 pm
What does the SEC mean when it says big money? [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 12:00 pm
" It is remarkable that the USPTO does not even mention Article 4(1)(b) when it asserts that "no legal basis exists for registration of the mark as to goods/services that fall outside [the IB-assigned] classes under U.S. standards. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 11:18 am
However, it does not end there. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 7:55 am
In other words, Black didn't want to get stuck on the case without getting paid, which I consider to be a perfectly reasonable position.But what does this mean for Kuehne's protection under 1957(f)(1)? [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 9:08 pm
Does 1-4. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 1:49 pm
Doe v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 12:00 pm
Although it may serve as a national symbol of Canada (like the Statue of Liberty serves as a symbol of the USA), it does not qualify for protection as an "insignia" under Section 2(b).The Board therefore reversed the refusal to register.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 8:25 pm
In short, they argue that where a plaintiff suffers an adaptable injury - i.e., an injury that does not permanently affect the happiness of an individual-settlement is easier for two reasons: (1) over time, "the degree to which a plaintiff believes she has been 'wronged' will dissipate," and therefore, (2) the plaintiff will accept a lower settlement offer because she will believe that less money is required to make her whole. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 4:21 pm
Does 1-4, after the university advised the Court that it could not identify John Does #8, 9, and 14 to a reasonable degree of technical certainty, Judge Nancy Gertner deemed the letter a motion to quash, and granted it, quashing the subpoena as to those defendants:The Court treats Boston University's 9/23/08 Letter as a Motion to Quash and GRANTS the motion with respect to Doe Defendants # 8, 9, and 14. [read post]
23 Nov 2008, 6:08 am
What does this say about the editors that allowed this poorly researched material to be published? [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 6:13 pm
In re John Hamilton Cox, Jr. and Kathryn Burgess Cox, Ch. 7 Case No. 08-13461-WHD (filed November 17, 2008). [read post]
