Search for: "John Doe - 1" Results 8061 - 8080 of 14,620
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2013, 10:16 pm by Ken
Rosing makes a good case that, at least, pursuing discovery or bringing John Doe actions is not objectively unreasonable enough to warrant sanctions. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 4:37 pm by Juan Antunez
The apparent intent behind the adoption was a ploy to qualify the girlfriend for a 1/3 share of a $300 million trust otherwise benefiting Mr. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 10:31 am by Jeff Kosseff
  Defendant John Doe 1, who operated a website about the law school, sought a protective order and moved to quash the subpoena to his Internet service provider. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 7:40 am by Rebecca Tushnet
. ​Jessica Litman, John F. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 11:53 pm by Gretchen Goetz
“This is disgusting,” wrote John Overcash, the Food Service Director for Littleton Public Schools in Massachusetts, referring to Segal’s Change.org petition. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
  I found an excellent updated summary by Ari Berman of The Nation, who always does an excellent job of reporting on this subject. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Accordingly, the “animus” rationale does not look like a narrow basis for invalidating Prop 8. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 9:35 pm by Benjamin Wittes
For example, Marcy makes a big deal of Fredman’s supposed failure to rely on the August 1 OLC torture memo and his reliance instead on a fax sent some weeks earlier by John Yoo for a key reading of the torture statute: when Fredman wrote the Abu Zubaydah torture team, translating DOJ’s guidance, he did not rely on the authoritative memos approved by Jay Bybee. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 9:36 pm by Ken
As April 2 fast approaches, you might be asking yourself: what sorts of tools does Judge Wright have at his disposal if he finds that Prenda Law attorneys or clients have committed misconduct? [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm by Bexis
In honor of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's recent grant of an appeal on the Restatement (Second)/Restatement (Third) in Tincher v. [read post]