Search for: "Little v. Little"
Results 8061 - 8080
of 39,476
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2015, 11:56 am
The Supreme Court granted certiorari on Friday in OBB Personenverkehr AG v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 9:27 pm
Cephalon, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 1:43 pm
The post Google v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 9:10 am
Immigration is always a hot-button issue in American politics, but I suspect that this case will attract little, if any attention. [read post]
31 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s April 5 dicta in a concurring opinion in Berman v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
Bose Corp. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 6:13 am
Why this should vary because of "heightened scrutiny" as the length of the period grows longer makes little sense. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 8:36 pm
The case of Javed v British Telecommunications plc [2011] EWHC 90212 (Costs) is an interesting example of claimant solicitors being penalised for issuing proceedings unnecessarily and prematurely. [read post]
How a watch manufacturer could make the use of foreign manuscripts and artwork a copyright violation
12 Jul 2010, 2:24 am
(by Peter Hirtle) One wouldn’t normally expect a lawsuit between a watch manufacturer (Omega) and a big-box retailer (COSTCO) about the scope of “gray-market” sales of manufactured goods to have much of an impact on libraries and archives, but the upcoming Supreme Court case of Costco v. [read post]
22 Dec 2019, 4:12 pm
The Court reiterated the principle that under Article 10, there is ‘little scope’ for restrictions on political speech and expression on matters of public interest, citing the Grand Chamber in Baka v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 8:01 pm
A copy of the full order and analysis in the Spencer v Hartford case. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 10:52 am
In other words, the Act appears, at this juncture, to be both underinclusive and overinclusive, irrespective of the government interest at stake The court is taking potshots at the legislative drafting choices, which might seem a little like Monday-morning quarterbacking. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 7:19 pm
On 3 April 2019 the Supreme Court gave its judgment in Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17. [read post]
28 May 2017, 8:30 am
Standing In my writings on the travel ban cases, I have spent little time addressing justiciability. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 8:45 am
See Mozes v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 9:55 am
Groupion's pursuit of Google in an otherwise garden-variety trademark case reminded me a little of the Parts Geek v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 10:46 am
DorfOn Monday the Supreme Court granted certiorari in the amusing little case of Vidal v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 3:54 am
Brown v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 5:34 am
., v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 5:50 am
This afternoon the UC Hastings College of the Law will host a Supreme Court preview, featuring (among others) regular SCOTUSblog contributor Rory Little. [read post]
