Search for: "Mark"
Results 8061 - 8080
of 151,847
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2023, 10:20 am
The Mark eventually registered in 2003 (the Registration). [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 3:06 am
But what about the marks? [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 3:02 am
The Board found it premature to decide on the connotation of the cross-design element of the cited mark, and likewise premature to decide whether CODE is the dominant portion of each mark. [read post]
13 Aug 2024, 3:12 am
Petitioner's marks are inherently distinctive. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 2:07 am
In its decision of late 2013 (decision No. 26498/2013 of 27 November 2013, published on 20 December 2013), the Italian Supreme Court took a different view.As to acquiescence, the Supreme Court established that Italian Trade Mark Law is "absolutely clear and unequivocal" in stating that right holder of an earlier trade mark is no longer entitled to oppose the use of a later trade mark only as far as he or she has acquiesced for a five-year period in the use of a… [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 10:49 pm
Volkswagen sued the defendant for trade mark infringement. [read post]
2 May 2018, 1:30 am
Respondent provided copies of 67 live, third-party registrations for such marks, accompanied by printouts or photographs showing use of the marks. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 2:09 am
"The Marks: Not surprisingly, the Board found applicant's marks to be similar to the AMERICAN EXPRESS mark in appearance, sound, meaning, and commercial impression. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 4:43 am
”Similarity of Marks – As is common when the opposer is relying on different marks and registrations for its opposition, the Board focused only on the mark it found “most pertinent” for its du Pont analysis, i.e., the JUSTICE CENTRAL mark. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 7:46 pm
Ms Minogue is the owner of a number of trade mark registrations and applications in the US for KYLIE and KYLIE MINOGUE.Under the US concept of trade mark "dilution", by establishing that the mark is a famous mark, the owner of the mark can prevent anyone else using that mark without having to establish any likelihood of confusion. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 3:00 pm
By its decision, the Swiss Federal Supreme Court granted the registration of the mark after a 7-year long dispute. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 2:37 pm
Rather, the company can object to uses of the trade mark that fall within the grounds of infringement under s.10 Trade Marks Act 1994 (TMA 1994). [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 3:22 am
"Famous marks are accorded more protection precisely because they are more likely to be remembered and associated in the public mind that a weaker mark. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 5:11 am
Turning to the marks, the Board first considered the sixth du Pont factor, the number and nature of similar marks in use on similar services. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 3:26 am
Nor did PepsiCo allege that its mark TORTRIX has a reputation among relevant U.S. consumers, but only that it uses the mark in Central and South America. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 9:20 am
It conceded that jewellery can take the form of the contested trade mark. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 4:44 am
This was deemed an error on the part of the Board of Appeal.The first part of the plea dealt with a lack of use of the mark in the form as registered, and therefore would only stem from the branding or the use of other marks in conjunction with the contested mark. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 3:09 am
Sie klagte auf Unterlassung gegen die Labo Cosprophar AG, die unter der Marke "BOTOINA" eine Kosmetiklinie zur Entspannung von Ausdrucksfalten vertreibt. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 3:45 am
§ 1052(d), for the reason that Applicant’s mark (as used in connection with Applicant’s goods) resembled a registered mark DUO as likely to cause confusion. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 2:06 am
"Family of Marks: In its brief, Petitioner for the first time claimed a family of marks. [read post]
