Search for: "STATE V. POWERS" Results 8061 - 8080 of 41,395
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2009, 1:46 am
[IPKat comment: 2 huge problems with this - (1) all these factors go towards showing that there's a link between the marks, but they don't really show that the link has 'rubbed off' on the later mark to give its owner an unfair advantage; (2) these are the factors that were used in relation to detriment to distinctive character, but the court has just said that these are two different types of harm; (3) the ECJ in Intel v CPM said such factors are insufficient for… [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 5:11 pm by Epstein Becker Green
Olsen The United States Supreme Court declined to review the Second Circuit’s decision in Irizarry v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 6:00 am by JB
  An election in such circumstances risks becoming a one-shot referendum on who will hold state power to do in the rivals. [read post]
12 Aug 2007, 7:05 am
Law and Poetry Innis Claude stated in Power and international relations that law is the poetry and politics the prose of government. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 1:42 am by centerforartlaw
Murals often serve as powerful expressions of a community’s identity, history, and cultural diversity. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 11:01 am
" This is the orthodox view of the treaty power, articulated most famously by Justice Holmes in Missouri v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
 Because the English Court had jurisdiction over the defendant it has no power to stay proceedings on the grounds of forum non conveniens (see Owusu v Jackson [2005] 1 QB 801, ECJ). [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 9:00 pm
In a controversial decision issued on February 25, a federal judge ruled that a moratorium on residential evictions, issued by the the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, violates the United States Constitution.In Terkel v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 1:39 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
IRS Abuses Power in Targeting Tea Party The extraordinary revelation this week that the Internal Revenue Service targeted tea party groups for more aggressive enforcement highlights exactly why caution is needed in any response to the much-vilified Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. [read post]