Search for: "Sees v. Sees"
Results 8061 - 8080
of 121,937
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
” I have no particular brief for high Federalists from New England, but I do wonder what we might think had Garrison actually been influential and several New England states accepted his view and tried to secede, say, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Prigg v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 4:25 am
” She noted that, as in United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 12:51 am
A Legal, Political, and Pragmatic Perspective: the short answer, one would have thought, was “Yes”: see, for example, the Church of England. [read post]
7 Jan 2023, 10:23 pm
This "gamers' lawsuit" against Microsoft-ActivisionBlizzard (DeMartini et al v. [read post]
7 Jan 2023, 7:15 pm
Box v. [read post]
7 Jan 2023, 11:37 am
State v. [read post]
7 Jan 2023, 7:48 am
See the slides here: Patent Year in Review. [read post]
7 Jan 2023, 7:37 am
” * Jones v. [read post]
7 Jan 2023, 5:13 am
Illinois Brick could have been overruled in Apple v. [read post]
7 Jan 2023, 1:24 am
Substantial evidence is "a minimal standard that requires less than a preponderance of the evidence and demands only the existence of a rational basis in the record as a whole to support the findings upon which the determination is based" (see Matter of Blamah v New York Off. of the State Comptroller, 207 AD3d 905. [read post]
7 Jan 2023, 1:24 am
Substantial evidence is "a minimal standard that requires less than a preponderance of the evidence and demands only the existence of a rational basis in the record as a whole to support the findings upon which the determination is based" (see Matter of Blamah v New York Off. of the State Comptroller, 207 AD3d 905. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:06 pm
In Cargill v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 4:22 pm
Ashlesh Biradar v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 12:22 pm
The proposed changes to marking requirements go beyond the SBIR/STTR Policy Directive and respond to the Federal Circuit’s decision in The Boeing Co. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 11:15 am
See, e.g., e-ventures Worldwide, LLC v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 10:28 am
v=ePC-FQwLnts The song apparently is her riffing off seeing the 50 Cent biopic. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 9:41 am
[The following was prepared as a Gibson Dunn client alert by Rachel Brass, Svetlana Gans, Kristen Limarzi, Ilissa Samplin, Katherine V. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:58 am
For similar provisions in Constitution of 1868 see Article I, Section 2. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:03 am
See United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:02 am
James v. [read post]
