Search for: "State of Indiana" Results 8061 - 8080 of 20,454
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2014, 6:39 am by Juan C. Antúnez
As of 2014, at least 22 states have followed suit: Alaska, Arizona, Delaware, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Missouri, Nevada, New Hampshire, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Wisconsin and Wyoming. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:55 am
Can Member States do so, or is it exclusively an EU prerogative? [read post]
6 Sep 2014, 7:26 pm by Howard Friedman
., Sept. 5, 2014), an Indiana Court of Appeals held that the Indiana Civil Rights Law applies to alleged racial discrimination by a Catholic high school in selecting members of its basketball team. [read post]
6 Sep 2014, 8:04 am by Steven Eversole
State, an appeal from the Indiana Supreme Court, Defendant and his co-worker were visiting with their boss at his home. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 5:21 pm
Approximately 206 miles of the line would cross the state from Kansas and then proceed into Illinois and Indiana. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 9:36 am
Chanel states that it has spent hundreds of millions of dollars to advertise and promote its goods. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 8:13 am by Amy Howe
  At the Council of State Governments, Lisa Soronen looks at the big picture, with brief previews of the issues that could affect states, while Adam Liptak of The New York Times previews Holt v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 7:36 am by Kenan Farrell
Chanel’s Salon LLC et al Court Case Number: 2:14-cv-00304File Date: Friday, August 29, 2014Plaintiff: Chanel, Inc.Plaintiff Counsel: Gregory A NeibargerDefendant: Chanel’s Salon LLC, Chanel JonesCause: Federal Trademark Dilution, Federal Trademark Infringement, Federal Unfair Competition, State Unfair Competition, State Trademark InfringementCourt: Northern District of IndianaJudge: Judge Theresa L. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 6:01 am by Julie Deisher
Writing for a unanimous court, Judge Richard Posner states that neither state has supplied a rational, or even reasonable basis for forbidding same-sex marriage. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
., Sept. 4, 2014), affirmed district court decisions striking down same-sex marriage bans in Indiana and Wisconsin. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 3:42 am by Robin Shea
Faux Pas 4: “This employee is displeasing to me, and we’re in an employment-at-will state. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 8:01 pm
Posner notes that Indiana refuses to recognize same-sex marriages from other states while recognizing the marriages of fertile first cousins from other states (even though, like same-sex marriages, first-cousin marriages are banned in Indiana itself). [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 5:09 pm by Lyle Denniston
Indiana has banned same-sex marriages by state law since 1997; it does not have a ban in its state constitution. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 2:54 pm
It asks whether the statute actually furthers the interest that the state asserts and whether there might be some less burdensome alternative. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 1:52 pm by Jason Mazzone
Texas, 539 U.S. 558, 577–79 (2003), and United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 1:18 pm
It also claims unfair competition and trade mark infringement and unfair competition under Indiana common law. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 12:42 pm
Medtronic, Inc., 421 F.3d 482, 489 (7th Cir. 2005) (emphasis added).Another appellate court, this one in Indiana, agreed. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 11:49 am
Since 2009, Indiana has been wrestling whether a provision of its state corporate income tax impermissibly burdens interstate commerce. [read post]