Search for: "State v House" Results 8061 - 8080 of 28,334
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2007, 10:57 pm
The case pit a dozen states and a dozen environmental organizations against the Bush Administration, ten other states, and many polluters. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
On appeal from: [2013] EWCA Civ 494 The Supreme Court unanimously allowed the appeal challenging the Court of Appeal’s decision to set aside the damages awarded to the appellant under the Housing Act 1988, s 28, following his unlawful eviction by the respondents. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 4:38 pm by NL
Also differences based on housing status has been held to be within Art 14 (Larkos v Cyprus 30 EHRR 597, R (RJM) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2009] 1 AC 311).If the arguments were right, it would affect many provisions of the Housing Acts and Rent Acts. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
Maybe paternalistic central planning cannot tolerate parallel state law efforts to restore state lands. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 7:40 am
(Photo by Zofia Smardz/The Washington Post) It’s in Justice Scalia’s opinion this morning in Whitfield v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 2:29 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
On January 11, 2011, a federal grand jury indicted 17 individuals as a result of an investigation by the Food and Drug Administration - Office of Criminal Investigation (FDA-OCI), with the collaboration of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Puerto Rico Police Department (PRPD), announced today United States Attorney Rosa Emilia Rodríguez-Vélez. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 2:29 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
On January 11, 2011, a federal grand jury indicted 17 individuals as a result of an investigation by the Food and Drug Administration - Office of Criminal Investigation (FDA-OCI), with the collaboration of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Puerto Rico Police Department (PRPD), announced today United States Attorney Rosa Emilia Rodríguez-Vélez. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 12:25 am by Abhinav Chandrachud
A recent United States Supreme Court opinion in the case of Citizens United v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 1:47 pm
He contends that he stated the gist of a meritorious claim that his appellate counsel was ineffective for not arguing that the State knowingly used false or misleading testimony to obtain the indictment. . . .People v. [read post]