Search for: "State v. Dollar"
Results 8061 - 8080
of 9,610
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2019, 5:01 am
[ii] This is eight dollars below the minimum-wage rate of $58 a day. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
The Bardal factors come from the decision in Bardal v. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 9:30 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals, in a case called Loving v. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 5:12 pm
Flora et al. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 10:01 am
Professor Buchanan cites Perry v. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 4:08 pm
Clearly, big attention-grabbing cases such as Lloyd Rayney v The State of Western Australia (damages of $1.8m, including damages for economic loss, with another $773,866 in interest), Rebel Wilson v Women’s Day, Women’s Weekly, New Weekly and OK! [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 11:07 am
It is about a young federal public defender handling a case, United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 4:56 pm
Engle v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:07 am
Relying principally on Sternberg v. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 8:43 am
Grand & Toy Alberta Ltd., Thornton v. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 11:59 pm
Watch for the decision in McDonald v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 1:14 pm
Brock v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 9:45 am
Thus, for example, in Thompson v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 3:32 am
Balsamides v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
Canada (Attorney General) and Coastal GasLink Pipeline Ltd v Huson. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 2:14 pm
Before last week, I know of no legal authority in the United States who claimed to hold this position. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 1:39 pm
Custody Evaluations; v. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 11:48 pm
While the petition does not specifically lay out what portions of the relevant statutes and United States Constitution the FCC violated, Verizon is clearly invoking the APA's arbitrary and capricious test. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 5:03 pm
The case, Roberts v. [read post]
A Presidential Proclamation to End the Iraq War: Unilateral Executive Action to Defang a Zombie AUMF
20 Aug 2024, 6:05 am
The Resolution provides that the: President is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to— (1) defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and (2) enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq. [read post]
