Search for: "State v. Minor"
Results 8061 - 8080
of 16,410
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2024, 12:08 pm
In Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 7:05 am
These defendants owned 100 percent of AR Capital, but took RCAP public, retaining only a minority interest in RCAP. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 5:03 am
To be precise, Scalia said there is no principled basis on which to distinguish the two "minority" groups. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 10:01 am
Abbott El Dorado Estates v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 12:15 pm
The cases being heard by the Supreme Court on March 23, Zubik v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
, (December 8, 2015).From elsewhere:Samuel V. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 12:34 pm
Supreme Court (Frazier v. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 5:34 am
Under common law a mark is protectable through its use, or as was stated by Justice Pitney in United Drug Co v Theodore Rectans Co: "...the right to a particular mark grows out of its use, not its mere adoption; its function is simply to designate the goods as the product of a particular trader and to protect his good will against the sale of another's product as his". [read post]
1 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
In a 4-2 decision in Oberholzer v. [read post]
5 Jan 2013, 10:30 pm
In an unpublished October 2012 New Jersey post-divorce case, Albinson v. [read post]
13 Nov 2016, 6:13 am
Meigs, Lincoln’s General, Master Builder of the Union Army is also reviewed in the newspaper.Nicholas Syrett's American Child Bride: A History of Minors and Marriage in the United States is reviewed at Slate. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 8:21 am
The recently decided Sixth Circuit case of Howell v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 7:17 am
It plays an especially important and outsized role for minority communities seeking to foster solidarity online and to highlight issues vital to them. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 7:41 am
Wilson v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 12:29 pm
DocName=075000050HPt%2E+V&ActID=2086&ChapterID=59&SeqStart=6100000&SeqEnd=8350000Read More [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 9:41 am
The court remanded to chancery to consider the general partner’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, which it raised for the first time on appeal.The case is No. 489, 2019. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 5:59 am
He loses both claims.The case is Garcia v. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 5:45 am
DocName=075000050HPt%2E+V&ActID=2086&ChapterID=59&SeqStart=6200000&SeqEnd=8675000Read More [read post]
16 May 2013, 4:06 pm
Supreme Court's preemption analysis in Geier v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 7:35 am
There are exceptions to the federal rule, and this case -- involving child abuse by the Catholic Church -- is one of them.The case is In re Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany v. [read post]
