Search for: "State v. Powers" Results 8061 - 8080 of 36,866
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2018, 9:28 am by Randy Barnett
His views on war powers and separation of powers are encouraging. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
Program, is researching the Chase Court's rejection of the legal mechanisms designed to exclude ex-Confederates from power, part of a larger project on "democratic disqualification" in the history of the United States. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:02 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
It has already proved it has no problem shunning precedent or being out-of-touch, for example see Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 11:25 am by Eugene Volokh
After Congress halted tribal treaty-making in 1871, the Court 's 1886 U.S. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 5:40 pm by Jon
Much discussion of the Wickard v. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 2:35 pm by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
Constitution restricts the power of States to disrupt contractual arrangements. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 7:56 am by Marty Lederman
Ashcroft that “‘it is incumbent upon the federal courts to be certain of Congress' intent before finding that federal law overrides' the ‘usual constitutional balance of federal and state powers. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 8:20 am by Don Cruse
The Court did grant the State's motion to particpate in the upcoming oral argument in City of Dallas v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 1:31 pm by JB
It was also addressed by the doctrine of Swift v. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 7:49 pm
 A few months later, EPA issued the PSD permit authorizing Deseret to build the waste-coal-fired generating unit and stating that Massachusetts v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court for argument time to support a challenge to New York City gun restrictions,” New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 7:07 am
Watson Issue: Limited by the Court to the following question: Whether an action for criminal contempt in a congressionally created court may constitutionally be brought in the name and pursuant to the power of a private person, rather than in the name and pursuant to the power of the United States. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 1:01 am by David Mead, University of East Anglia
The police, perceiving a risk of violence and disorder (which did eventuate), imposed a cordon under the common law power to keep the peace. [read post]