Search for: "State v. So " Results 8061 - 8080 of 116,395
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2023, 7:52 am by Eugene Volokh
An interesting decision Wednesday by N.Y. trial court judge Thomas Marcelle (Albany County), Hines v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  To take one example, at the time that the Court decided the leading qualified immunity case of Harlow v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 5:16 am by Eugenia Lostri, Stephanie Pell
Such “disruption campaigns must become so sustained and targeted” that malicious cyber activity becomes “unprofitable” for cyber criminals and state actors no longer view it as an “effective means for achieving their goals. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Trump White House Pressured Disney to Censor … Jimmy Kimmel MSN – Asawin Suebsaeng (Rolling Stone) | Published: 2/26/2023 In early 2018, then-President Trump was so upset by late night host Jimmy Kimmel’s comedic jabs he directed his White House staff to call up one of Disney’s top executives in Washington, D.C., to complain and demand action. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm by Bryn Hines
Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 4:29 pm by David Greene
But other courts, and some state laws, believe the First Amendment only requires that an objectively reasonable person would perceive the statement to be a threat of violence.The Supreme Court is considering a case called Counterman v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 2:36 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
George did not want to live there, however, and had a hard time finding someone willing to pay what he thought was a reasonable rent, so he wanted to tear down the mansion and build an apartment building. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 1:43 pm by Christopher Simon
So we turn to the recent case coming out of the Georgia Court of Appeals in the 2023 case of Jones v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 11:50 am by Holly
SSN never consented to personal jurisdiction in the United States, so there was no “suitable defendant,” and Prudential could pursue a claim against the domain name in Virginia because that’s where its registry is. [read post]