Search for: "State v. South"
Results 8061 - 8080
of 10,977
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2020, 11:55 am
Regnier v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WHO members near accord on global strategy on IP and health: (Intellectual Property Watch), (GenericsWeb), (Gowlings), (IAM), Copiepresse seeks up to €49 million from Google in lawsuit over right to feature links to publishers’ content on internet: (IPKat), (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360) Singapore ‘image… [read post]
24 Nov 2007, 7:11 am
Family Voices members are paid staff within the Title V agency, providing information and support on health concerns to families around the state. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 12:02 pm
In 2013, the Supreme Court in Shelby County v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
However, denial of one petition is reversed where the state court's lack of notification and petitioner's prompt filing after receiving a response to his inquiry to the state court justified tolling. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 11:45 am
The United States Supreme Court actually rejected the notion that the Federal Government can require an individual to purchase health insurance in a now-famous 2012 decision authored by Chief Justice John Roberts in National Federation of Independent Business et al. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 12:44 pm
The Court of Appeal decision in Patel v London Borough of Hackney (2021) EWCA Civ 897 (our note) was also considered. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan had little justification in the internationallaw the United States claimed to be upholding, and the United States prosecuted the wars whileindifferent to the civilian casualties they imposed. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 12:54 pm
But Rabner's interpretation tracks the Lewis v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 1:18 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 4:18 pm
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia A District Court of South Australia has granted a pre-action discovery to identify a person behind an anonymous WeChat account, to allow the prospective plaintiff to bring a claim for defamation, Yu v Yong [2022] SADC 10. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 3:00 am
Jeffords v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 11:45 am
In Deutsche Bank AG v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 9:00 am
Manago v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 11:24 am
See Conte v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 9:00 am
Manago v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:58 am
(EPLAW) Montenegro Re-register those Serbian designs – in Montenegro (Class 99) New Zealand Now it’s IPONZ getting a facelift… (Patentology) Poland The circumstances of bad faith (Class 46) South East Asia Geographical Indications in South East Asia – show me the money! [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:49 pm
Entertainment, et al. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 9:33 pm
V. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 4:52 pm
United States NPR reports on the so-called “pink slime” libel case between Beef Products Inc and ABC News will take place in a South Dakota state court this week. [read post]
