Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Laws"
Results 8061 - 8080
of 55,071
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2019, 2:13 pm
Robert v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 12:38 pm
v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 10:09 am
On June 29, 2010, the California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, decided People v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 7:32 am
I suspect that most people, reading this blog post, would simply be puzzled — what am I talking about?! [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 12:34 pm
(See People v Devinny, supra.) [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 11:14 am
Would it be fair, in hindsight, to say that people like Justice Scalia, who believe that homosexuals do not deserve constitutional protection from discriminatory laws, are homophobes? [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 7:13 am
Schwartz Distinguished Professor of Law at the UCLA School of Law and is an affiliate at the law firm Schaerr Jaffe. [read post]
27 Jun 2009, 3:40 pm
In A.C. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 5:34 pm
At the end of the day, however, caring for people requires the human touch. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 7:38 am
Canal Co. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 4:50 am
Legal Blog Watch catches Charles Nesson, a professor at Harvard Law School and a founder of Harvard's Berkman Center for Internet & Society, getting reprimanded in the SONY BMG Music v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 2:35 pm
The former law professor should give Justice Sotomayor another reading assignment. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 9:48 am
here, the "political divisiveness along religious lines" argument in church-state law has always been wrong: Nearly thirty-five years ago, in Lemon v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 12:07 pm
The SEC cites to SEC v. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 10:44 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
17 May 2008, 6:04 am
In Arista v. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 10:38 am
In Arista v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
Under RFRA, people with religious scruples may obtain exemptions from burdensome laws, even if those laws do not specifically target religion. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 10:47 am
I’ve mentioned in passing that anti-stalking laws are often used to squelch criticism, and this is a good example. [read post]
31 Dec 2006, 3:10 pm
Michael Bramley v. [read post]
