Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 8061 - 8080
of 9,848
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2010, 9:48 pm
(Greystone),15 and United Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 5:06 pm
’” Elaborating on that ruling, today’s decision in United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 1:33 pm
The 11th Circuit issued United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 10:44 am
Although the “judgment” filed by appellant purports to be from outside the courts of Ohio and the United States, the authority of the members of the panel supposedly comes from their status as notaries public, a status that comes from their commission by the State of Ohio. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 7:53 am
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.I'm back to the Second Amendment because of this comment, because I find my own views on the Second Amendment so at odds with how I see the world, and because, frankly, I haven't figured out just what I want to say about Judge Bolton's order in United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 4:49 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 4:10 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 1:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 12:02 pm
t of Consumer Affairs v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 3:40 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 7:18 am
See United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 9:04 pm
This is the train of citations (Sidhom is not pertinent): Thomas (2002): The defendant, however, bears the ultimate burden of proving, by a preponderance of the credible evidence, that the evidence should not be used against him (see, People v Berrios, supra at 367; People v Baldwin, 25 NY2d 66, 70; People v Whitehurst, 25 NY2d 389, 391; Nardone v United States, 308 US 338, 341-342), and that the police lacked probable cause to arrest… [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 10:48 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 10:06 am
It is probably the broadest injunction in the entire body of United States law, because it is designed to stop the "race of diligence" among creditors, and to protect the debtor and the bankruptcy estate, in Arizona and the rest of the country. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 7:28 am
(citing Wilson v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 5:40 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 6:16 pm
Rather, the burden should shift squarely to the State. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 5:19 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 5:08 am
In my research this week, I came across a recent case from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida that I thought I would share: Vision I Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 2:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
