Search for: "United States v. Close"
Results 8061 - 8080
of 14,200
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2017, 9:30 am
” As the district court noted in United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 11:48 am
A ,Virginia state court barred the closing of a gun range. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 12:10 pm
, a Bosnian Croat general, thus bringing the case to a close. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 9:01 pm
United States. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 9:59 am
Texas, 18-9674, and United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 1:37 pm
United States. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
Additionally, the court referred to a landmark Supreme Court case, Carpenter v United States,[3] and noted that the purpose of the Fourth Amendment was to safeguard privacy and security of individuals against arbitrary invasions by governmental officials. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 6:25 am
Mitchell v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 1:40 pm
Some of the Justices are known to have resented it when the President in January 2010 told them what he thought about their controversial ruling in the case of Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 8:27 pm
United States, the double jeopardy/dual sovereignty case. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 5:33 am
Solutions are to be found in countries like the United States, Switzerland, India and Spain. [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:42 am
United States, 367 U. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 5:04 am
As the Supreme Court said in United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 10:38 am
United States, 196 U.S. 375 (1905). [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 10:38 am
United States, 196 U.S. 375 (1905). [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:11 am
– Puerto Rico Fixed Income Fund V, Inc. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 11:05 am
Statutes at Large, v. 8, at 444) was terminated by the United States because of Russia’s discriminatory immigration policies. [read post]
12 Jan 2013, 6:33 am
The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution states, “No person … shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 7:00 am
They were buoyed by Justice William Rehnquist’s 1985 dissent in Wallace v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 8:05 am
The sole exception appears to be where the applicant is close to dying and there is insufficient care available in the returning country to enable the applicant to die with dignity: N v Secretary of State for Home Department [2005] UKHL 31; [2005] 2 AC 296 and N v UK (2008) 47 EHRR 885. [read post]
