Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court" Results 8081 - 8100 of 9,064
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2023, 4:24 am by Michael C. Dorf
Our column anticipated that hypocritical lawyers working for Trump would say that the Electoral Count Act is unconstitutional, despite the Supreme Court's reliance on it in Bush v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 5:00 am by Eugene Volokh
How can the district court declare the individual mandate unconstitutional? [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
"[25] It is also suggested by the Supreme Court's non-application of an independent exterritoriality test in almost two decades;[26] by [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 5:48 pm by Yvonne Nath
According to the Arizona Supreme Court, “an ABS is an entity that provides legal services and has nonlawyer ownership, managers, or decision-makers in the business. [read post]
16 Dec 2007, 1:59 am
12/14/2007 9:21:00 AM David CraryNEW YORK (AP) - More than at any time over the past 30 years, the future of capital punishment is in limbo.The Supreme Court will hear arguments next term in a momentous lethal injection case. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 4:09 am
Supreme Court, for instance, ruled this year that the habeas clock is ticking even while an inmate is asking for the high court to review state post-conviction proceedings. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 7:14 am
" Id. at *20.That's the question the Supremes have up in Arizona v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 3:16 pm by Theodore Harvatin
More Blog Posts: Arizona Supreme Court Holds That Officer’s Assertion of Lawful Authority Does Not Negate Totality of the Circumstances Test, Illinois DUI Lawyer Blawg, May 7, 2016. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 5:17 am by Mark S. Humphreys
USAA spokesman Roger Wildermuth said it disagrees with the ruling and is appealing to the Montana Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 2:11 am
There is talk now that this could see the Act put out to the long grass as the committee gets on with other things - not the least of which will be scrutinising President Obama's Supreme Court pick Sonia Sotomayor. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 7:04 am by lawmrh
But notwithstanding the position of Eric Holder’s Justice Department and the doom-gloom of some pundits, I still like Kamala Harris’s primary argument, which is that 8 U.S.C., 1621(c) is inapplicable because attorney licensing isn’t provided by a state agency but by the California Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 11:28 am by Steve Matthews
 Thorsteinssons’ lawyers blogged on such topics as the Supreme Court Rules on the Envision Credit Union Case, CRA rules favourably on repayment of upstream loans followed by sale of foreign affiliates, and 231.2(1) Requirements and the Protection of Solicitor-Client Privilege, Lawrence Koplow, Arizona DUI lawyer, blogged on A reported result versus a complete result on how a DUI result is not complete until the report includes the… [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 11:10 am by owner
To determine when a suspect is technically under arrest and entitled to Miranda warnings, Washington has adopted the “Berkemer test” which is explained by the United States Supreme Court in Berkemer v. [read post]
6 Nov 2006, 1:30 pm
Supreme Court's intervention. [read post]