Search for: "Branch v. State" Results 8081 - 8100 of 8,128
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2007, 10:02 pm
It does not state that it will strike something down in litigation involving great public controversy and then, faced with mounting criticism from public opinion and the political branches, suddenly announce that its previous decision was inoperative. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 9:03 pm
The ratification debates and Federalist Papers can be supplemented by evidence of ordinary usage and by the constructions placed on the Constitution by the political branches and the states in the early years after its adoption. [read post]
6 Jan 2007, 3:43 am
Supreme Court has granted certiorari in National Association of Home Builders v. [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 4:07 pm
  The Supreme Court jump started this issue in January through its work in Hill v. [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 7:44 am
In the thinly-reasoned opinion of Stuart v. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 11:31 am
Marty Lederman, Chalk on the Spikes: What is the Proper Role of Executive Branch Lawyers, Anyway? [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 4:35 am
Separation of powers lets the different branches of government check each other's errors and enthusiasms, but it cannot work if the executive branch insists that it will do whatever it wants anyway. [read post]
17 Dec 2006, 10:48 am
  And a final example is provided by Article V of the United States Constitution. [read post]