Search for: "CO.1. Means" Results 8081 - 8100 of 16,765
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2015, 3:35 am
The court went on to explain that the videoshows Cardwell's two minor children (Minor 1 and Minor 2) dancing naked with Cardwell's co-defendant and then-boyfriend, Michael Cardwell, who was also naked. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:34 am
 Never Too Late 70 [week ending on Sunday 1 November] –  Case T-309/13 Enosi Mastichoparagogon Chiou v OHIM, Gaba International Holding GmbH | Sixteen millions IPKats | Tomaydo-Tomahhdo LLC v George Vozray et al | Lookalike packaging | Parasite copying | 3D printing | Labouring the point? [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The absence of a First Amendment determination means that the ruling does not have any impact on restricting speech outside the criminal context. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 6:07 am
(I need to preface this post with a caveat:  It is very long because it addresses difficult issues involved in deciding when a Public Records Act applies to a state employee's use of his/her cell phone to conduct official business. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 5:00 am
§§360j(l)(1), 360j(l)(3)(A).Allen thus involved a device that had been used for decades. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 12:08 pm by James P. Yudes, Esq.
 If your family is local and your spouse’s family are remote, sharing may mean your spouse gets more time. 7) Ask yourself, “What do the kids want? [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 5:00 am
But before we get to that, let’s talk a little bit about what “co-parenting” means. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 2:51 pm by Darius Whelan
MayoDetails at http://www.maryrobinsoncentre.ie/events.htmlSat. 28 Nov. 2015:Current Legal Challenges Facing Primary School Management - Law School, Trinity College Dublinhttp://www.tcd.ie/Law/events/2015/primary-schools-legal-challenges.phpMon. 30 Nov. 2015:Direct Democracy Considered – Irish, Scottish, Swiss, and Transnational European Perspectives on the Use of Referendums, Quinn School of Business, UCDDetails at http://www.ucd.ie/law/eventsseminars/title,260230,en.htmlTue.… [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 2:12 pm
It did not consider the trade mark descriptive nor deceptive.What does this mean? [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 11:07 am by Susan Hennessey
From a prosecutorial standpoint, that means a lot of bang for your buck. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 10:49 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Culligan International Co., 415 F.3d 620, 624 (7th Cir. 2005), “described as frivolous an argument that a person-to-person communication is actionable under § 43(a)(1)(B). [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:25 am by INFORRM
It also discusses whether a request for information made in a tweet is a valid request within the meaning of sections 1 and 8 of FoIA. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 3:30 pm by Giles Peaker
It appears that the tenants of the properties had not co-operated with the trustee (which of course they did not have to do) in providing their details. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 9:33 am
  More controversially, does the decision mean that confidential information (and possibly any information that can be sold) now constitutes property in New Zealand, contrary to current UK and Australian law? [read post]