Search for: "Cost v. Cost" Results 8081 - 8100 of 48,971
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2020, 8:22 am
  While the political benefit of the provision of medical staff outside of Cuba has brought some positive political benefits, it is not clear that the overall economic effects have been enough to dent the shortfalls from other economic sectors (and this is particularly the case where some of the provision of medical services may have been done at reduced at no cost to the recipient territory). [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 6:31 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
She therefore awarded damages for the loss of employment benefits over the remainder of the contract, as well as a sum to offset the moving costs incurred in seeking new employment. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 2:38 pm by Evan M. Hamme and Caroline Koo
The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court released its decision in the much-anticipated Synthes USA HQ Inc. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 1:07 pm
First, it argues that the regression is invalid because it assumes that a borrower defaults on a predatory loan because of the loan’s high costs and onerous terms, and not because of well-recognized causes of foreclosure like job loss, medical hardships, or divorce. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 8:59 am by Gene Killian
As the late Justice O’Hern wrote in the seminal New Jersey allocation case of Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 8:59 am by Gene Killian
As the late Justice O’Hern wrote in the seminal New Jersey allocation case of Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 11:50 am by petrocohen
He also has a Superb rating on AVVO and an A/V rating with Martindale-Hubbell, both of which are the highest possible ratings by the respective organizations. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 5:25 am by Judith Robinson
The judgment in Coty Inc v Costco Wholesale Canada Ltd dismissed the application on the grounds that the requirements for a Norwich order were not met. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 5:25 am by Judith Robinson
The judgment in Coty Inc v Costco Wholesale Canada Ltd dismissed the application on the grounds that the requirements for a Norwich order were not met. [read post]