Search for: "Defendant Doe 2" Results 8081 - 8100 of 40,590
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2020, 1:48 pm by Andrew Appel
Venetis on August 21 that they’re planning to use some sort of on-line voting system that does not satisfy the criteria enumerated above, then she will seek a court order to prevent any internet-based system from being used. [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 1:11 pm
  Hong Kong may be permitted to deviate from a uniform march toward that core objective--to strive for that perfection at its own pace and consist with its own stage of development--but that different pace does not change the direction of the political development of Hong Kong. [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 10:07 am by Eugene Volokh
Bolton: {Defendant [former National Security Advisor John] Bolton has gambled with the national security of the United States. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 1:38 pm
Given the Court's repeated refusal to interfere with the process on remand, that eventuality does not seem likely.2. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 1:38 pm
Given the Court's repeated refusal to interfere with the process on remand, that eventuality does not seem likely.2. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 1:35 pm by Dennis Crouch
Ct. 1589, 1594 (2020) recently walked through this explanation. [2] U.S. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 10:37 am by Calvin Cohen
  Third, the DOJ supports “adding a provision to make clear that a platform’s decision to moderate content either under (c)(2) or consistent with its terms of service does not automatically render it a publisher or speaker for all other content on its service. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 10:17 am by Jeffrey Neuburger
§230(c)(2) by eliminating the broad catchall in the statute that affords providers leeway in filtering decisions to screen out “objectionable content” and replace it with examples of content which can be screened out with impunity, namely content that is “unlawful” or “promotes terrorism. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
Importantly Access Copyright does not itself hold any of the copyrights that it manages. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
 The court has scheduled a hearing on all pending pretrial motions, beginning at 2 p.m. on July 29, 2020. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 11:19 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Holding such instances to be fair use may mitigate the damage, but it makes the fair use doctrine more complicated and implicitly suggests that the defendants in such cases did take enough to infringe, which encourages future plaintiffs to try their luck with aggressive copyright claims. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 10:14 am by Jonathan Holbrook
(1) Error, but no prejudice, in admitting field test results on suspected cocaine in assault and attempted robbery case; (2) Defendant waived variance issue with habitual felon indictment. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 9:00 am by Tessa Shepperson
The tenant defended the claim on the basis that because no gas safety certificate had been provided prior to her taking occupation, the landlord was not entitled to serve notice under s.21. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 9:00 am by Tessa Shepperson
The tenant defended the claim on the basis that because no gas safety certificate had been provided prior to her taking occupation, the landlord was not entitled to serve notice under s.21. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 8:24 am by Jonathan Bailey
The Appeals Court maintained that there is a “strong presumption” of attorneys’ fees in frivolous cases but felt the lower court was appropriate in denying them here. 2: Hartford Wins Copyright Infringement Case with Fabric Retailer Next up today, Judy Greenwald at Business Insurance reports that Hartford Financial Services Group, a company that specializes in business insurance, has won a decision in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals that holds the company… [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 6:38 am by Linda McClain
” As Dale Carpenter succinctly puts it: “When it comes to bigotry, Americans agree on three things: (1) bigotry is very bad; (2) they are not themselves bigots; and (3) some other people, mostly those who disagree with them, are bigots. [read post]