Search for: "Does, A-H"
Results 8081 - 8100
of 16,617
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2014, 3:46 am
The point raised by Eugene, that citation to a New York Times article does not prove the point, has some validity. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 6:00 am
During this one year, does a brief business trip to United States will make me ineligible for another six years of H-1B status? [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Back in June, a California superior court judge declared that a group of state laws governing the employment of public school teachers is unconstitutional. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 1:13 pm
Att’y Gen., Docket Number 13-13069, Decided September 3, 2014; Circuit Court held that nunc pro tunc stand-alone INA § 212(h) waiver does not exist. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 5:58 am
A bill signed into law week, S.L. 2014-119 (H 369), took things even further, authorizing conditional discharge for any misdemeanor or Class H or I felony that would be eligible for a deferred prosecution. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 4:07 am
H/T Stephanie West Allen Copyright © 2013 Simple Justice NY, LLC This feed is for personal, non-commercial and Newstex use only. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 7:02 pm
This H-1B petition was selected after the lottery. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 3:16 pm
(h) All fire engines, hooks and ladders, with the carts, trucks and carriages, hose, buckets, implements and apparatus thereunto appertaining, and all furniture and uniforms of any fire company or department organized under the laws of this State. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 3:16 pm
(h) All fire engines, hooks and ladders, with the carts, trucks and carriages, hose, buckets, implements and apparatus thereunto appertaining, and all furniture and uniforms of any fire company or department organized under the laws of this State. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 1:10 pm
Michael H. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 7:39 am
” But when the federal law provides limited remedial authority (e.g., does not create a private right of action), claims seeking “basic” state law remedies under “basic” state law theories should be permitted to go forward, the court concluded here. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 7:12 am
www.erskine-law.com Daniel H. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 7:12 am
www.erskine-law.com Daniel H. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 4:42 am
BMW has filed a motion to compel (copy here, h/t: Nick Fishman, at the EmployeeScreen IQ Blog), asking the court to require the EEOC to disclose in discovery its own policy for criminal background checks in hiring. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 4:40 am
Another segment of the population does like that law.It's a harsh law, no doubt. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 1:18 pm
If Mavrix had sent takedown notices, they could have obtained any identifying information about the uploaders through a 512(h) subpoena, but no 512(c)(3) takedown notices = no 512(h) subpoena. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 1:10 pm
§ 78u-6(h)(1). [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 2:55 pm
The Court held that “[t]h[is] cost provision, by its plain terms, places the costs an agency incurs in preparing the record on the parties, not on the public agency. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 8:07 am
And how does he do it? [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 7:41 am
So then what does it mean to be lawfully arrested for a California DUI? [read post]
