Search for: "HARMS v. HARMS"
Results 8081 - 8100
of 36,795
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2015, 11:58 pm
The three branches of the U.S. government--legislative, executive, judiciary--have all become aware in recent years of the negative effects of overprotection of software-related intellectual property. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (2017 SCC 34). [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 10:02 am
“The Garniers’ social media comments did not use profanity or threaten physical harm, and almost all of their comments related to PUSD. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 9:15 am
By Eric Goldman Universal Communication Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 10:07 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Lee v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:44 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 4:20 pm
On 30 March 2015, the Upper Tribunal gave judgment in the case of Department of Health v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 9:20 am
López against Anthony Vázquez-Arroyo for attempting to take a motor vehicle that was transported, shipped, and received in interstate or foreign commerce from the person and presence of another by force, violence, and intimidation, with the intent to cause death and serious bodily harm, announced today Rosa Emilia Rodríguez-Vélez, United States Attorney for the District of Puerto Rico. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 5:17 am
See, e.g., Doe v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 5:42 am
As Wikipedia notes, a tort, “in common law jurisdictions, is a civil wrong that unfairly causes someone . . . to suffer . . . harm resulting in legal liability” for the person who is wholly partially responsible for that harm. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 5:32 am
" Even in such cases, "courts do not simply presume severe harm. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 8:44 am
Abbott Labs. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 4:05 am
I prefer the first explanation -- that it is sheer folly and not an ethical breach -- though a savvy Internet based business must surely anticipate the repercussions to their client of additional commentary on the subject.In either case, I think a legal malpractice claim could theoretically be made against Dozier for taking a bad situation and making it worse, in the event DirectBuy is harmed by their counsel's conduct. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 9:50 am
The court sentenced him to a total of 340 months, with three of the sentences running consecutively, based on its finding that the two burglaries of which Ice was convicted constituted "separate incidents," and that Ice’s conduct during the burglaries (which formed the basis for four other convictions) demonstrated a "willingness to commit more than one offense" "caus[ing] or creat[ing] a risk of causing greater or qualitatively different loss, injury or harm… [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 1:35 pm
The egg develops a thick shell that protects it from extreme temperatures and even digestive enzymes, meaning that it can be transported within the digestive tracts of animals without harm. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 4:05 am
I prefer the first explanation -- that it is sheer folly and not an ethical breach -- though a savvy Internet based business must surely anticipate the repercussions to their client of additional commentary on the subject.In either case, I think a legal malpractice claim could theoretically be made against Dozier for taking a bad situation and making it worse, in the event DirectBuy is harmed by their counsel's conduct. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 5:13 am
Andy Warhol Foundation v. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 11:52 am
Perry v. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 8:30 am
Thus, the Court held that Aero Spray would not suffer irreparable harm in the absence of an injunction, and the balance of harms favored the Government. [read post]
