Search for: "In Re: Designation of Judges" Results 8081 - 8100 of 9,823
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2010, 4:15 pm
The phrase “res ipa loquitur” (the thing speaks for itself) leaps to mind. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 6:15 am by Jason Wilson
I know there is a school of thought around that, that you should design your interface in such a way that you collect the maximum amount of data from your users by making them click on this or click on that. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 4:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Expects a roadmap from Judge Chin for an acceptable settlement within the framework of class action law. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 11:30 pm
  He challenged the conviction on the ground that the trial judge erroneously ruled his confession admissible, in violation of his right to counsel. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 10:54 pm by Jeff Gamso
Mitchell, 1993), though, and while I can pontificate, they actually get to decide the question.But what they're doing in Queens is somewhat different.Rather than using the law to enhance punishments for crimes motivated by "invidious hatred toward particular groups," Rather, they're using the statute to enhance punishments on those who target the elderly because they're believed to have money and to be easy prey.They do that because the hate crime… [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 3:40 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Nature of the work: photos are generally considered creative; paintings, sculpture, and architectural designs always are. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:34 pm by thejaghunter
A federal judge stepped in to block the state passed and signed emergency budget effort. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 3:39 am by Russ Bensing
Shanklin provides a helpful tip for defendants trying to claim they’re incompetent to stand trial:  given that the standard is the ability to distinguish the trial judge from a rutabaga, you’re going to have to do better than telling the doctor that “it’s hot in the wintertime” if you want to convince him you should be in a rubber room instead of a courtroom. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 11:37 am by Laurie Lin
The Case Against: - We’re not loving the sideways pose. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 7:41 am by Steve Hall
Babcock made his comments as the commission heard objections to the findings of a judge who served as special master in In Re: Sharon Keller. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 11:53 pm by Carolyn Elefant
Sure, we’ve all heard the story of the blind judge that used to ask his clerks to tell him whether a female attorney appearing before him wore a skirt or pants. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 5:00 am by Liam Thornton
In Re X, the Supreme Court refused to narrow its application, describing the doctrine as “the widest nature. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 12:40 pm by Rick Hills
These are literally mundane issues with which state judges have greater experience. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 5:37 am by Susan Brenner
But as I noted in an earlier post, if a private citizen engaged in conduct that would violate the 4th Amendment and thereby discovers evidence that implicates you in a crime, you’re out of luck if that person takes the evidence to the police. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 3:02 pm
(Patent Docs) US: District Court M D North Carolina: $4.8 million attorneys’ fee award designed to reimburse not punish: Aventis CropScience v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 4:30 am by Mary Giorgi
" The Court in Donovan found it appropriate to extend general negligence principles to claims regarding "exposure to toxic substances . . . even if the full effects [of those substances] [we]re not immediately apparent. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 7:50 pm
Cir. reverses on obviousness, and orders reassignment to new Judge: TriMed, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 11:09 am by Nathan
  Pallmeyer isn’t an appellate judge, she’s with the Northern District of Illinois, sitting here by designation. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 10:44 am by KC Johnson
Right now, we’re training students for our past, not for their future. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 5:28 am by Russell Jackson
Judge Chesler's opinions suffer from only one apparent flaw:  they should be designated for publication. [read post]