Search for: "In v. United States" Results 8081 - 8100 of 102,847
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2015, 6:06 am by Immigration Prof
West Courtroom at Fifth Circuit Courthouse The Hill reports that the Fifth Circuit has announced that it has set a date to hear an expedited appeal of District Court Judge Andrew Hanan's preliminary injunction halting the implementation of the Obama... [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 8:00 am by Paul Caron
Tax Prof Amicus Briefs for the Government: John Brooks (Fordham), David Gamage (Indiana) Brian Galle (Georgetown), Cliff Fleming (BYU), Jacob Goldin (Chicago), Edward McCaffery (USC), Ajay Mehrotra (Northwestern), Richard Schmalbeck (Duke) Ari Glogower (Northwestern), David Kamin (NYU), Rebecca Kysar (Fordham), Darien Shanske (UC-Davis), NYU Tax Law Center Andy Grewal (Iowa)... [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:39 pm by Micah Belden
On March 2, 1942, the petitioner, therefore, had notice that, by Executive Order, the President, to prevent espionage and sabotage, had authorized the Military to exclude him from certain areas and to prevent his entering or leaving certain areas without permission. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 10:00 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here are the materials: CA9 Order Denying En Banc Petition + Opinions US En Banc Petition NCAI Amicus Brief Bryant Response Panel materials and commentary are here. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 4:41 pm by Ross M. Wolfe
Description/Success Story/Testimonial: Represented whistleblower in an action against two local hospitals for healthcare fraud, resulting in a $1.25 million settlement. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 3:42 pm by Micah Belden
In the dilemma that he dare not remain in his home, or voluntarily leave the area, without incurring criminal penalties, and that the only way he could avoid punishment was to go to an Assembly Center and submit himself to military imprisonment, the petitioner did nothing. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:45 pm by Micah Belden
We cannot shut our eyes to the fact that, had the petitioner attempted to violate Proclamation No. 4 and leave the military area in which he lived, he would have been arrested and tried and convicted for violation of Proclamation No. 4. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 3:45 pm by Micah Belden
We cannot shut our eyes to the fact that, had the petitioner attempted to violate Proclamation No. 4 and leave the military area in which he lived, he would have been arrested and tried and convicted for violation of Proclamation No. 4. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 6:17 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: Criminal Defense Attorney Amicus Prior posts here (order granting en banc review), and links to briefs here. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 3:51 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: Navajo Opening Brief.pdfDownload US Brief.pdfDownload Other briefs TK. [read post]
7 May 2020, 10:18 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: Federal Opening Brief Humane Society Opening Brief Idaho Opening Brief Montana Opening Brief Safari Club Opening Brief Sportsmen’s Alliance Opening Brief Wyoming Farm Bureau Opening Brief Wyoming Opening Brief Crow Answer Brief Northern Cheyenne Tribe Answer Brief Wildearth Guardians Answer Brief Alliance for the Wild Rockies Answer Brief Federal Reply Idaho Reply Montana Reply Brief Safari Club Reply Sportsmen’s Alliance Reply Wyoming Farm Bureau Reply Wyoming Reply Lower court… [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:42 pm by Micah Belden
In the dilemma that he dare not remain in his home, or voluntarily leave the area, without incurring criminal penalties, and that the only way he could avoid punishment was to go to an Assembly Center and submit himself to military imprisonment, the petitioner did nothing. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 4:26 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Oral argument here: Briefs here: Stillaguamish Brief.pdfDownload Hoh Answer Brief.pdfDownload S’Klallam Tribes Answer Brief.pdfDownload Swinomish Answer Brief.pdfDownload Tulalip Answer Brief.pdfDownload Upper Skagit Answer Brief.pdfDownload Reply.pdfDownload Lower court materials here. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 8:43 am
United States (2nd Circuit, 11-2510 April 10, 2013), investors victimized by Bernard Madoff and Bernard L. [read post]