Search for: "LaBelle v. LaBelle" Results 8081 - 8100 of 12,213
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
None of them, from Shakespeare to the Bible, has to be distributed with a warning label. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 6:22 am
There are now seven cases holding that FDA-approved warnings or other conduct is within the safe harbor for government authorized activity - the seventh being Prohias v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
(IP Think Tank) Whitehouse.gov’s 3rd party content under CC-BY (Creative Commons) EFF’s site FreeYourPhone.org launches, pushes for new DMCA exemption (Ars Technica) Corporation of Public Broadcasting agrees on internet royalty payments (ContentAgenda) Music piracy not that bad, industry says (TorrentFreak)   US Copyright – Decisions District Court W D Virginia: Judge decides 17,000 illegal downloads don’t equal 17,000 lost sales: United States of… [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 1:37 pm
There are some older cases about trademark - for my purposes, the key ones are Friedman v. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 4:15 pm
• Includes a Radura label that allows consumers to make a choice to buy or avoid irradiated product, depending on their assessment of the pros and cons. [read post]