Search for: "Person v. Person" Results 8081 - 8100 of 123,244
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2023, 3:38 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Therefore, a contractual provision will be void only to the extent it purports to oust the jurisdiction of the Tribunal, for example by making the landlord’s (or some other person’s) decision final and binding, or requiring the Tribunal to presume or ignore certain facts. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 12:38 am by David Pocklington
None of the objectors was an “interested person” within the meaning of Rule 10.1. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 2:57 pm by Eugene Volokh
From the WIPO Arbitration & Mediation Center Administrative Panel Decision in Polanski v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:38 pm by Thomas James
(Reproduction of a portion of the Complaint filed in Getty Images v. [read post]
On January 13, the court ruled that under Sikkim Income Tax Manual 1948, “[a]ll persons engaged in business were subjected to tax irrespective of their origin. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
” Among others, VC Laster cited Caremark itself, the equating of officer duties with director duties in Gantler v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
” Among others, VC Laster cited Caremark itself, the equating of officer duties with director duties in Gantler v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
The Supreme Court rejected that presumption in Nebraska Press Ass’n v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Historically, directors have been protected from personal liability in connection with risk management by the high standard set in the seminal 1996 Caremark[1]case. [read post]