Search for: "Record on Appeal"
Results 8081 - 8100
of 55,771
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2009, 4:07 pm
Stayed tuned, as the State may appeal the decision to a higher court. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 5:01 am
While this decision was on appeal, the United Kingdom withdrew the extradition request. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 11:54 am
Cherokee Nation Council: 1- Petition in Error 1-16-13 2- Designation of Record for Appeal from District Court 1-16-13 3- Notice 1/17/13 4- Amended Petition in Error 1/25/13 5- Application for Injunction and Expedited Hearing 1/28/13 6- Brief-In-Chief 2/4/13 7- Cherokee Nation’s Motion for Partial Dismissal of the Amended Petition in Error filed by Amici Cu 8- Cherokee Nation’s Motion to Strike Application for Injunction and Expedited Hearing of Amicus Cur… [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 5:42 pm
We are going to file an application for post-conviction relief to vacate the conviction and, if that fails, an appeal is contemplated. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 2:20 pm
Apr. 23, 2008) (summary disposition), CAAF observes that "it appears that in its rendition of the facts, the [Navy-Marine Corps] Court of Criminal Appeals may have considered matters from outside the record. [read post]
12 May 2012, 6:24 am
The federal appeals court agreed. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 5:56 pm
The requirement that the hearing be recorded by the court reporter is designed to ensure that the record is sufficient for appellate review of the rape shield ruling. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 10:23 am
Reviewing the administrative record and the agency’s action de novo in the same manner as the trial court, the Court of Appeal observed: [T]he City’s decision in the initial step of the multi-tiered process that the approval of the conditional-use permit was exempt from CEQA necessarily included an implied determination that the unusual-circumstances exception was inapplicable. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 10:23 am
Reviewing the administrative record and the agency’s action de novo in the same manner as the trial court, the Court of Appeal observed: [T]he City’s decision in the initial step of the multi-tiered process that the approval of the conditional-use permit was exempt from CEQA necessarily included an implied determination that the unusual-circumstances exception was inapplicable. [read post]
2 Feb 2019, 1:36 pm
On December 27, 2018, the Court of Appeals decided J.C. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 9:28 am
The appeals court, first did not think it was even a hearsay document, and second, that even if it was hearsay, that it should have come in either the public record exception or business records exception. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 6:20 pm
The Washington Supreme Court held, while the right isn’t absolute to represent yourself on appeal, there has to be something in the records to support that. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 3:58 pm
The records included such information as names, dates of birth, procedures and Social Security numbers. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 8:48 am
Recordings guarantee accuracy and completeness. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 3:58 pm
The records included such information as names, dates of birth, procedures and Social Security numbers. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 10:47 am
Supreme Court and federal appeals courts have already made the move to digital court reporting in an effort to cut costs. [read post]
9 Apr 2025, 5:30 am
A New York City police officer [Petitioner] was found guilty of "wrongfully caused inaccurate entries in official records regarding his confrontation with a civilian and improperly caused her arrest based on such entries" after a disciplinary hearing and was terminated from his position. [read post]
9 Apr 2025, 5:30 am
A New York City police officer [Petitioner] was found guilty of "wrongfully caused inaccurate entries in official records regarding his confrontation with a civilian and improperly caused her arrest based on such entries" after a disciplinary hearing and was terminated from his position. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 11:10 am
There was no evidence in the record as to how long this process takes. [read post]
3 Dec 2006, 7:41 am
This ILB entry from Dec. 1st quoted from an Indianapolis Star story of that date reporting that "On Thursday, representatives from Planned Parenthood and Carter's office signed a settlement agreement worked out after a Sept. 22 Indiana Court of Appeals ruling said a minor's right to privacy trumps the state's desire to search for evidence of abuse. [read post]
