Search for: "STATE v COUNTS"
Results 8081 - 8100
of 17,258
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2015, 9:45 am
King v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 9:02 pm
Thomas, though, has stated that view as a dissenter, most notably in the 2002 decision in Harris v. [read post]
21 Nov 2015, 10:32 am
State v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 5:00 am
Ryan v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 12:49 pm
Lozano, Wyoming State Public Defender; Tina N. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 8:14 am
Cordova, 2001 WY 96, ¶ 16, 33 P.3d at 149; State v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 6:00 am
” After Gonzales v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:49 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decided United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 4:29 pm
Jurors must be trusted to faithfully adhere to their duties (R v B). [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 3:53 am
” In Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 4:38 am
See generally United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:08 pm
Since damages for libel include compensation for distress, I must avoid double counting. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 7:00 am
As the late conservative Justice Antonin Scalia explained in Printz v. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 1:55 pm
The Supreme Court effectively redefined the concept in 1922 in United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 1:49 pm
Obergefell v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Similarly, petitioner's newly-asserted New York State unspecified constitutional religious freedom argument may not be considered for the first time on reargument, and, in any event, it is unavailing (see Kane v De Blasio, 623 F Supp 3d 339 [SD NY 2022] [City policy requiring workers in school settings to be vaccinated not unconstitutional]). [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Similarly, petitioner's newly-asserted New York State unspecified constitutional religious freedom argument may not be considered for the first time on reargument, and, in any event, it is unavailing (see Kane v De Blasio, 623 F Supp 3d 339 [SD NY 2022] [City policy requiring workers in school settings to be vaccinated not unconstitutional]). [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 2:38 am
”, is to put pressure on the state legislature to make Arizona the 38th ratifying state to satisfy Article V of the Constitution. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
It seems quite odd to require counting all people for purposes of dividing up representation among the states but not for drawing districts within each state. [read post]
[UPCKat] Revisiting lessons from the first ex parte UPC preliminary injunction in myStromer v Revolt
7 Aug 2024, 6:33 am
In particular, the Court pointed out that the obligation to cease and desist from an act that has created a persistent state of disturbance must generally be interpreted as meaning that it not only includes the cessation of such acts, but also the performance of possible and reasonable acts to eliminate the state of disturbance, such as deletion [read post]
