Search for: "Short v. United States"
Results 8081 - 8100
of 10,141
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2022, 9:03 pm
Department of Homeland Security can deport individuals while it evaluates their applications for asylum in the United States from Mexico. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 3:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 8:40 am
Even the non-terrorism Supreme Court case Steve cites as evidence of a greater judicial willingness to confer constitutional protections on non-citizens in the United States—Zadvydas v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 3:09 am
Spanish speakers constitute more that 12 percent of the United States population. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 3:39 pm
Parents could find themselves stuck outside the US waiting years for reunification with their children while the children’s juvenile immigration court proceedings drag on in the United States. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 11:17 am
This is especially true for essay mills, most of which are based outside the United States. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 12:20 pm
United States, 729 F.2d 1429, 1435–36 (Fed. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:11 pm
Meanwhile, at Guantánamo and elsewhere, the United States holds enemy combatants “for the duration of hostilities. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 8:16 pm
Question #5 – Business Visa (B1) If from a foreign country, but I have invested in a United States based business, can I apply for a business (B-1) visa? [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 10:17 am
In Matal v. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 9:53 am
Meanwhile, at Guantanamo and elsewhere, the United States holds enemy combatants “for the duration of hostilities. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 4:06 pm
Last year’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 8:45 am
The United States Attorneys Manual sheds light on how subpoenas are used as a tool. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 12:17 pm
But here’s the twist: This new, scientifically-driven awareness of the problem of false confessions has emerged only in the decades since the United States Supreme Court last visited the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments’ voluntariness doctrine in 1991’s Arizona v. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 2:51 pm
Judge Jackson’s fine work, her love of the United States, her balanced and principled decision making should resonate with all races. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 7:08 pm
States with existing Short-Time compensation statutes will receive 100% funding, whereas states without existing statutory Short-Time compensation programs will receive 50% funding. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 7:23 am
Such legislation would almost certainly pass constitutional muster: Under South Dakota v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 11:38 pm
(This works the same way in the United States, by the way.)The actual economic impact of this enforcement on Apple remains to be seen. [read post]
7 May 2012, 6:51 am
The Court greatly doubts that the general public of the United States is familiar with the Original DAHON mark. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
In August 2019, in Patel v. [read post]
