Search for: "State v. Doctor"
Results 8081 - 8100
of 9,600
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2010, 7:31 am
Increase the basic state pension, by relinking it to earnings, and protect the winter fuel allowance, free TV licences, free bus travel and other key benefits for older people. 5. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 2:33 am
She is “a well-known professor, doctor and humanitarian in Turkey. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 9:09 am
See Oster v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 4:02 am
In this case, Hearn was administered several IQ tests, both by the State and the defense. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 10:08 am
Typically, a judge would order the defendant to be evaluated at a state mental health hospital, and a doctor would ask that he be held. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 5:00 am
This is a big reason that plaintiff lawyers are so cynical towards doctors. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 3:00 am
Ray v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 8:25 pm
And Justice Scalia rejected the argument that unconscionability belonged in the same category as fraud and duress, dismissing the Court’s holding in Doctor’s Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 6:43 pm
State v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 5:00 am
(CSA) The guiding law on this matter is the Supreme Court case, United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 6:14 pm
In S.K. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:26 pm
If you are aware of Medicaid and/or Medicare fraud being committed against the United States government by a city, doctor, hospital, clinic, pharmacy and/or medical supply company, you may be entitled to a multi-million dollar award. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:23 am
Jones v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 7:49 am
Byrd v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 5:15 am
Judge Wood cited Hanna v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 8:35 am
In Taylor v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 7:32 am
See United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 10:26 am
62/09, The Queen, on the application of the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry v Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency; the NHS Confederation (Employers) Company Ltd is potentially of great importance to at least one class of intellectual property owners -- the proprietary pharmaceutical sector. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 8:46 pm
See Lips v. [read post]
