Search for: "State v. Law" Results 8081 - 8100 of 173,909
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2013, 5:26 pm
The plaintiff moved to remand the case to Wisconsin state court based on the “corporate governance exception,” which applies when a class action’s claims solely relate (1) “to the internal affairs or governance of a corporation” (2) based on the laws of the state of incorporation. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 9:00 am by P. Andrew Torrez
Today, we’re doing something a little different, taking our cue from a recent New York state appellate decision:  Brown & Brown, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 11:58 am by Unknown
State of Utah (Jurisdiction)Ak-Chin Community v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 2:15 am
Another lawyer had a a pending case dealing with an out of state child support payor when I first read New York Divorce and Family Law Blog's Out-Of -State Support Orders Cannot Be Modified in New York : In this day and age in which parties obtain an order regarding child support in one state and then move to another jurisdiction, it is important to know that the original support order cannot be modified or even extended by a court in the second… [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 9:27 am by Steven M. Taber
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit on Monday, July 26, 2010, in State of North Carolina v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
“While an entity must be authorized pursuant to state law to be within the ambit of the Open Meetings Law . . . , not every entity whose power is derived from state law is deemed to be performing a governmental function. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 5:56 pm by Francis Pileggi
LLC employees from continuing a whistleblower action over allegedly false Plavix blood thinner marketing because one of them dropped out, in United States of America, et al. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 11:27 am by Dennis Crouch
By Professor John Golden, Professor in Law, The University of Texas at Austin Mayo Collaborative Services v. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 4:57 pm by James Eckert
The Court of Appeals has addressed whether someone is registerable both via Article 78 and direct appeal (North v Board, 8 NY3d 735 [2007]; People v Kennedy, 7 NY3d 87 [2006]). [read post]