Search for: "State v. Read" Results 8081 - 8100 of 64,431
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2019, 4:00 am by Canadian Association of Law Libraries
Such divergent opinions provide the reader with much to ponder, making for an engaging read. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 3:38 pm by William Weinberg
SUPREME COURT RULES THAT DUI BLOOD TEST REQUIRES A WARRANT On June 23, 2016, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in the case Birchfield v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 3:38 pm by William Weinberg
SUPREME COURT RULES THAT DUI BLOOD TEST REQUIRES A WARRANT On June 23, 2016, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in the case Birchfield v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 11:55 am by Steve Bainbridge
Yes, LBers, you’ve read that correctly: a state has invoked eminent domain in order to take back land from the feds. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
Case Commented On: Ahluwalia v Ahluwalia, 2022 ONSC 1303 (Can LII); 2023 ONCA 476 (CanLII) Intimate partner violence (IPV) takes many forms, all of which cause harm to survivors (who are disproportionately women and children). [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 9:51 am by Kevin Sheerin
Matter of John Welsh v New York State Comptroller Petitioner commenced this Article 78 appeal to review a determination of respondent Comptroller denying petitioner’s application for accidental disability retirement benefits. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 10:15 am by Kevin Sheerin
Matter of Tracy Wolak v Thomas DiNapoli, as State Comptroller This Article 78 proceeding was brought about to review a determination of the Comptroller denying petitioner’s application for accidental disability retirement benefits. [read post]
10 Mar 2007, 2:20 pm
Special master Michael Patrick King ruled, in State v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 10:53 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Florida (Tribal-State Gaming Compacts – Good Faith Negotiations)Schlemm v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 11:31 am
Want to see how you "distinguish" (read: overrule) prior circuit holdings without an intervening Supreme Court decision? [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:03 am by Marty Lederman
" This might be read as a suggestion that the U.S. has virtually conceded that DADT, like DOMA, is unconstitutional. [read post]