Search for: "U.S. v. STATE OF TEXAS"
Results 8081 - 8100
of 8,610
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2008, 12:14 pm
Glen Theatre, Inc., 501 U.S. 560, 569 (1991) (quoting Paris Adult Theatre I v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 5:31 pm
Earlier coverage of Medellin v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 11:32 pm
Texas, in which the Court found that the State of... [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 1:27 pm
The state is likely to appeal the decision.Major League Baseball Advanced Media, et al. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 2:29 am
" The case is United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 9:34 pm
” In Cuellar v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:08 pm
Here is another, Stadter v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
., ABPP, from Houston Texas. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 3:19 pm
And, the granddaddy of all of them, Colorado Amendment 2, declared unconstitutional in 1996 by the U.S. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 7:00 am
In a ruling that will keep Santos from having to return to prison to finish a 15-year sentence, and one law enforcement officials say will make it harder to prosecute organized crime figures, in U.S. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 12:46 am
Supreme Court held in Illinois Brick v. [read post]
31 May 2008, 8:11 pm
Texas, in which the Court ruled that states may not use criminal law to penalize consensual adult private homosexual conduct. [read post]
30 May 2008, 3:32 pm
As readers might be aware, the U.S. [read post]
30 May 2008, 3:16 am
Lane v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 3:12 am
District Court for the Southern District of Texas in Renhcol, Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 2:41 am
Attorney Jay V. [read post]
27 May 2008, 6:33 pm
At SCOTUS Blog, Lyle Denniston reports that the U.S. [read post]
27 May 2008, 10:06 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, May 20, 2008 US v. [read post]
25 May 2008, 8:18 pm
Texas 5-1-2000 Question:Does an amended Texas statute that authorizes the conviction of sexual offenses on the victim's testimony alone, whereas the statute previously required the victim's testimony along with corroborating evidence, violate the constitutional prohibition against State "ex post facto" laws when applied in a trial for offenses committed before the amendment's effective date? [read post]
23 May 2008, 7:28 am
Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003), must satisfy an intermediate level of scrutiny under substantive due process; and 2) such inquiry requires facts not present on the record before the circuit court. [read post]
